Inc. v. City of Hialeah Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye - Significance
Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc.
City of Hialeah
Animal sacrifices should be allowed in rituals of religion.
Chief Lawyers for Petitioner
Douglas Laycock, Jeanne Baker, Steven R. Shapiro, Jorge A. Duarte
Chief Lawyers for Respondent
Richard G. Garrett, Stuart H. Singer, Steven M. Goldsmith
Justices for the Court
Harry A. Blackmun, Anthony M. Kennedy (writing for the Court), Sandra Day O'Connor, William H. Rehnquist, Antonin Scalia, David H. Souter, John Paul Stevens, Clarence Thomas, Byron R. White
Date of Decision
11 June 1993
Religious sacrifices are allowable.
- Swanson By and Through Swanson v. Guthrie Independent School Dist. No. I-L, 135 F.3d 694 (1998).
- Boadle, Anthony. Reuters, 22 May 1997.
- Greenhouse, Linda. "Court, Citing Religious Freedom, Voids a Ban on Animal Sacrifice." New York Times, 12 June 1993.
- Rohter, Larry. "Santeria Faithful Hail Court Ruling." New York Times, 13 June 1993.
- Cincinnati v. Cincinnati Contemporary Arts Center - Significance, Obscenity Or Art?, The Nea And Sexually Explicit Art, Further Readings
- Charles Keating Trials: 1991-99 - Acc Buys Lincoln Savings And Loan, Litigation Abounds, Keating Draws Maximum Sentence, Keating Loses In Civil Court, Too
- Inc. v. City of Hialeah Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye - Significance
- Other Free Encyclopedias