Other Free Encyclopedias » Law Library - American Law and Legal Information » Notable Trials and Court Cases - 1989 to 1994

Florida v. Hill: 1994 - Killing At The Clinic, Two Fast Trials, Appeals For A "martyr", Suggestions For Further Reading

abortion murder paul abortions

Defendant: Paul J. Hill
Crimes Charged: Murder, attempted murder, and shooting at an occupied vehicle
Chief Defense Lawyer: Paul Hill
Chief Prosecutor: James R. Murray
Judge: Frank
L. Bell
Place: Pensacola, Florida
Dates of Trial: October 31-November 3, 1994
Verdict: Guilty of all charges
Sentence: Death by electrocution

SIGNIFICANCE: Paul Hill was the first anti-abortion activist sentenced to die for murdering a doctor who performed abortions. His case also highlighted the growing willingness of some pro-life advocates to use violence to achieve their goal of outlawing abortion.

Protests outside abortion clinics became a common sight during the 1980s and 1990s. Pro-life activists took their message to the streets, trying to dissuade young mothers from having abortions and challenging the morality of the procedure. Some activists also began to target doctors who performed abortions, harassing them or threatening their safety. This new tactic in the anti-abortion movement became extreme in 1993, when 32-year-old Michael Griffin murdered Doctor David Gunn outside a Pensacola, Florida, abortion clinic. When Griffin's trial began in February 1994, one of his most ardent supporters was Paul Hill.

A former Presbyterian minister, Hill had recently joined a radical faction of the pro-life forces that believed that killing doctors who performed abortions was justified in God's eyes. After an appearance on the Donahue television show, Hill became the most visible disciple of this faith-based defense of murder. Hill wrote extensively on the issue and called extreme anti-abortion violence "defensive action" to save the unborn. At Griffin's murder trial, Hill carried a sign that summed up his philosophy: "Execute murderers, abortionists, accessories."

Florida v. Riley - Significance, Impact [next] [back] Florida v. Bostick - Significance, Minority Opinion, Impact, Random Bus And Train Searches, Further Readings

User Comments

Your email address will be altered so spam harvesting bots can't read it easily.
Hide my email completely instead?

Cancel or

Vote down Vote up

about 9 years ago

"At Griffin's murder trial, Hill carried a sign that summed up his philosophy: 'Execute murderers, abortionists, accessories.'"

If this is the same sign that was displayed at Hill's own trial, it has a question mark at the end: "Execute murderers, abortionists, accessories?"
This changes the meaning significantly.

Hill's trial was a political show. Judge Bell denied Hill's defense, which was based on Florida law, from being presented. Judge Bell barred Hill's own attorneys from representing him.
The US and Florida constitutions forbid putting any human being outside the protection of the law. Human beings who are alive but not born are excluded by statute and court rulings from protection from their own mothers and their hired abortionists.