Other Free Encyclopedias » Law Library - American Law and Legal Information » Notable Trials and Court Cases - 1918 to 1940

Billy Mitchell Court-Martial: 1925

war air navy colonel

Defendant: Brigadier General William Mitchell
Crime Charged: Insubordination and "conduct of a nature to bring discredit upon the military service"
Chief Defense Lawyers: Frank G. Plain, Frank Reid, and Colonel Herbert A. White
Chief Prosecutors: Major Allen W. Gullion, Lieutenant Joseph L. McMullen, and Colonel Sherman Moreland
Judges: Major General Charles P. Summerall, Chief of the U.S. Army General Staff; Major Generals William S. Graves, Robert L. Howze, Douglas MacArthur, Benjamin A. Poore, and Fred W. Sladen; Brigadier Generals Ewing E. Booth, Albert L. Bowley, George Irwin, Edward K. King, Frank R. McCoy, and Edwin B. Winans; and Colonel Blanton Winship
Place: Washington, D.C.
Dates of Court-Martial: October 28-December 17, 1925
Verdict: Guilty
Sentence: Suspension from rank, command, and duty with forfeiture of all pay and allowances for five years

SIGNIFICANCE: The Billy Mitchell court-martial demonstrated not only that a prophet is without honor in his own country but that he is particularly unwelcome in the military. The longest and most controversial court martial in U.S. history, it came to epitomize the difficulty military strategists have in adapting to changing times and technologies. The cost of the country's resultant unpreparedness for World War II lies beyond reckoning.

Nineteen-year-old William Mitchell enlisted in the Army in 1898, at the outbreak of the Spanish-American War. By World War I, he had realized the significance of the airplane, put himself through flying school at his own expense, risen to the rank of colonel, and was chief of Air Service. Seeing the Army using the airplane at first only for observation and, later, to shoot at enemy planes, he was perplexed that strafing and bombing never occurred to the men who ran the war. He proposed to General John J. Pershing that troops be dropped behind German lines by plane and parachute "in order so to surprise the enemy by taking him from the rear that it would give our infantry an opening." Pershing found the idea impossible and absurd.

By the war's end, Mitchell was convinced that "Only an air force can fight an air force." Soon he had trained the first paratrooper, used the airplane for aerial mapping, developed the turbo booster and the variable-pitch propeller, predicted high-altitude flight where the thin atmosphere would permit speeds of 300 to 400 miles per hour, and mounted cannons on planes—ordnance not flown again until, ironically, it was mounted on the B-25 Mitchell bomber (named for Billy Mitchell) for Colonel Jimmy Doolittle's daring bombing of Tokyo early in World War II.

Declaring in 1921 that "the first battles of any future war will be air battles," Mitchell became an outspoken critic of the government's failure to develop the Air Service. When the House Naval Affairs Committee refused to let him demonstrate air power by bombing former German ships that had to be destroyed under the Armistice agreement, he went public, earning so many headlines nationwide with his descriptions of Navy vessels as "sitting ducks" that the House Appropriations Committee approved his plan.

Mitchell's bombers easily sank an old American battleship and a German submarine, cruiser, destroyer, and battleship.

The Joint Board of the Army and Navy promptly announced, "The battleship is still the backbone of the fleet." A colonel from the Engineer Corps was promoted to major general in command of the Air Service. Mitchell exhausted himself appearing before clubs and organizations, prophesying the air power of Germany, Russia, Italy, and Japan. Before a Congressional inquiry, he accused Army and Navy witnesses of "deliberate falsification of facts with intent to deceive the country and Congress."

To counter Mitchell's alarms, the Navy sent the aging dirigible Shenandoah on a tour. It crashed. Next a Naval "publicity flight" to Hawaii crashed. Mitchell told reporters:

My opinion is: Those accidents are the result of the incompetency, the criminal negligence, and the almost treasonable administration of our national defense by the Navy and War Departments.

Court-martial papers were served, charging the general with insubordination and conduct "to the prejudice of good order and military discipline."

For three weeks, defense counsel Frank G. Reid introduced witness after witness to prove that Mitchell, "after exhausting every usual means to safeguard the aerial defense of the United States without result, took the only way possible that would cause a study of the true conditions of the national defense to be made." Major (later General) Carl Spaatz testified on the country's numerical weakness in planes, Major (later General) "Hap" Arnold on the appalling number of deaths from worn-out equipment, former Captain Eddie Rickenbacker on the uselessness of anti-aircraft fire.

Mitchell himself testified:

The people have placed their trust in the War and Navy Departments, to provide a proper defense for the safety of the nation. It has not been done. I consider this failure to be… the criminal offense of treason.

The judges, not one of whom had ever been up in an airplane, debated for three hours, found Billy Mitchell "Guilty on all counts," and sentenced him "to be suspended from rank, command, and duty with the forfeiture of all pay and allowances for five years."

Colonel Billy Mitchell (far right) at his court-martial. (Courtesy, Library of Congress) Colonel Billy Mitchell (far right) at his court-martial. (Courtesy, Library of Congress)

A joint resolution of Congress immediately proposed to restore Mitchell's rank and reimburse his expenses. President Calvin Coolidge, as commander-in-chief, upheld the suspension but restored the allowances and granted the general half pay. Mitchell resigned. Congress passed no resolution.

Mitchell settled on a farm in Virginia, raising livestock, writing, speaking, and trying without success to found a University of Aviation.

Billy Mitchell died of pneumonia in 1936. Precisely as he had predicted, on December 7, 1941, the Japanese, without formally declaring war, destroyed Clark Field in the Philippines and the "sitting duck" U.S. Navy fleet at Pearl Harbor by aerial bombardment.

Bernard Ryan, Jr.

Suggestions for Further Reading

Davis, Burke. The Billy Mitchell Affair. New York: Random House, 1967.

Encyclopedia Americana, Volume 19. Ness York: Americana Corp., 1953.

Lardner, Rex. Ten Heroes of the Twenties. New York: G.P. Putnam's Sons, 1966.

Mitchell, Ruth. Mv Brother Bill. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co., 1953.

Block v. Hirsh - Significance, Hirsh Needs A Home, War Justifies Unlimited Governmental Powers, Even In Wartime, Any Violation Of The Constitution Is Evil [next] [back] Berrett-Molway Trial: 1934 - "boys, You've Been Picked By Five People", "that Rare Element In Murder Trials"

User Comments

Your email address will be altered so spam harvesting bots can't read it easily.
Hide my email completely instead?

Cancel or

Vote down Vote up

about 2 years ago

Actually, the planes sank an old German battleship (Ostfriesland). The ship was unmanned and therefore undefended. It was not moving. Its watertight doors had been compromised. It was listing about seven degrees at the time it was towed from New York Harbor. And finally, the agreed upon bombsize limits Mitchell elected to ignore. In the end, there was little realistic about the test.

Vote down Vote up

about 4 years ago

You say the Billy Mitchell court martial was "the longest and most controversial court martial in U.S. history." If my memory is correct, the longest court martial, and perhaps also the most controversial, was the court martial of Lt. William Calley. Calley went on trial at Fort Benning, Ga. in the late fall of 1970, and the verdict was not rendered until March 30, 1971.

Vote down Vote up

almost 7 years ago

To call this information unbiased is a joke. It is obviously bias in Billy Mitchell's favor. He did not easily sink the USS Alabama and German Ostfriesland. He violated the rules given to him by the Navy, after initial bombing runs were unsuccessful. The guidelines may have been to strict, but to say that Mitchell did this with ease is a dramatic understatement.

Vote down Vote up

over 1 year ago

a great general and my hero.

Vote down Vote up

almost 4 years ago

A great man and Aviator! Ashame that the "brass" not only yesterday but today don't listen very well either...

Wish there were more Officers like him...today, there are mostly "Zeros", instead of "Oh's", that command!

Vote down Vote up

over 6 years ago

What difference does it make if Mitchell's bombers didn't easily sink the USS Alabama and German Ostfriesland? He was proven right beyond a shadow of a doubt on December 7, 1941.

My dad was there that day (at Schofield Barracks, and he was a career Army soldier.

He revered Billy Mitchell and always felt that Mitchell was railroaded because those in charge were incompetent. History has proven Mitchell right. He is a genuine American hero.

Vote down Vote up

over 6 years ago

Mitchell's violation of the rules and guidelines did no more than simulate realistic modern battle conditions -- a fact which Germany and Japan so successfully demonstrated at the expense of the United States, France and England. The rules and guidelines were "strict" only in the sense that they strictly excluded any realistic view of the tactical problem and more generally the whole issue of national defense. The rules and guidelines under which Mitchell was ordered to operate could only be considered to have any relevance or be of any value, if potential/future enemies could somehow also be compelled to follow them. Since they could not, this comment, like the rules themselves, reflects the same childish thinking that lay behind them and ultimately proved so costly to the United States. Reality has a way of working its own will and not following orders.

Vote down Vote up

almost 6 years ago

After all is said and done, the bottom line here is had the War Department not been walking around with blinders on and/or with their heads stuck in the sand, many lives could have been saved and the United States would not have had to play "catch up football" in WWII. The mind set of the "Brass" at the time seemed to be that you could not improve upon existing technology, be it a car, ship, tank or plane...war is war and you've seen one, you have seen them all! They were obviously not thinking "out side of the box"...but Gen Billy Mitchell did. Granted, he should not have gone to the press after the Shenandoah crash and make his opinon public. However, he is a Hero none the less in my book and it saddens me that he died so young and was not able to bear witness to his predictions. I wonder what some on the court-martial board had to say after the attack on Pearl Harbor. May General Mitchell rest in peace.

Vote down Vote up

about 1 year ago

this is the price you pay for telling the truth.
I just wonder if any of his knockers ever apologised to him or admitted they were WRONG.

I don't think so. Maybe his accusers were guilty of treason and not the good general.

Vote down Vote up

about 1 year ago

this is the price you pay for telling the truth.
I just wonder if any of his knockers ever apologised to him or admitted they were WRONG.

I don't think so. Maybe his accusers were guilty of treason and not the good general.

Vote down Vote up

over 1 year ago

Look Daniel what the man saw was the future neen for air power and all those ground pounders and sea going Admirals could see was more boots on the ground and ships at sea. Billy Mitchell was keenly intelligent he saw then what the U.S. Air Force is today it is just that simple.