Other Free Encyclopedias » Law Library - American Law and Legal Information » Notable Trials and Court Cases - 1995 to Present » Miller v. Johnson - Significance, A Case Of Racial Gerrymandering, Points Of Affirmation And Dissension, Impact, Further Readings

Miller v. Johnson - Significance

court voters redistricting

In the case Miller v. Johnson the U.S. Supreme Court examined the constitutionality of a redistricting plan for the state of Georgia. The question they addressed was whether the reapportionment of congressional redistricts was a violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. They had to determine if this was a case of discriminatory racial gerrymandering that segregated voters based purely upon race and did not support any compelling interest for the state or local governments. Upon investigation, the Court ruled that the redistricting boundaries were highly unusual and violated the rights of majority and minority voters.

Miller v. Johnson - A Case Of Racial Gerrymandering [next]

User Comments

Your email address will be altered so spam harvesting bots can't read it easily.
Hide my email completely instead?

Cancel or