Other Free Encyclopedias » Law Library - American Law and Legal Information » Notable Trials and Court Cases - 1995 to Present » Oregon v. Mathiason - Significance, A Violation Of Miranda?, The Court Clarifies Miranda, Unfaithful To Miranda?, Impact

Oregon v. Mathiason - The Whitmore Confessions

borrero detectives assault beaten

On 23 April 1964, George Whitmore, Jr., witnessed an assault on Elba Borrero in Brooklyn and volunteered a description of the attacker to the police. Similarities between the Borrero case and the recent murder of Minnie Edmonds in the same neighborhood prompted detectives to have another talk with Whitmore. After questioning him for 22 hours without the presence of an attorney, detectives announced that Whitmore had confessed to both the Borrero assault and the Edmonds killing. The detectives also got Whitmore to sign a confession that he had committed the unsolved double murder of Janice Wylie and Emily Hoffert in Manhattan.

Whitmore contended that the confessions had been beaten out of him. Even when another arrest was made in the Wylie-Hoffert murders, Whitmore still was not dismissed, causing technicalities in his defense in the Borrero assault case. His guilt was assumed on racist grounds.

On 13 June 1966, when the Supreme Court handed down the Miranda decision regarding the rights of crime suspects, they acknowledged that coercive interrogations could produce false confessions. "[T]he most conspicuous example occurred in New York in 1964," stated a footnote, "when a African American confessed to two brutal murders and a rape which he had not committed. When this was discovered, the prosecutor was reported as saying: `Call it what you want--brain-washing, hypnosis, fright. The only thing I don't believe is that Whitmore was beaten.'"

[back] Oregon v. Mathiason - Impact

User Comments

Your email address will be altered so spam harvesting bots can't read it easily.
Hide my email completely instead?

Cancel or