Other Free Encyclopedias » Law Library - American Law and Legal Information » Crime and Criminal Law

White-Collar Crime: History of an Idea - The Evolution Of White-collar Crime, White-collar Crime From The Enforcement Perspective, Conclusion

instead criminal society concept

Crimes committed by persons of respectability have drawn the attention of societies throughout history. In the United States, interest in such phenomena far antedates the first public use of the concept of white-collar crime by Edwin Sutherland. The muckraking tradition at the turn of the century produced many persons who condemned abuse of position for private gain. Sociologist E. A. Ross, in Sin and Society, drew attention to "the man who picks pockets with a railway rebate, murders with an adulterant instead of a bludgeon, burglarizes with a "rake-off" instead of a jimmy, cheats with a company prospectus instead of a deck of cards, or scuttles his town instead of his ship" (p. 7).

The varied misdeeds denoted by Ross give an early hint of both the value of the concept and the difficulties that have plagued its use. The value is essentially social and evocative. It connotes not a particular type of crime or a statutory violation, but a concern for some combination of abuse of trust, authority, status, or position. In a society whose criminal justice system deals mainly with common crimes and common offenders, it bespeaks a concern for the misdeeds of the haves rather than the have-nots, and it raises the specter of class bias in law enforcement. However, its signifying power is precisely its weakness as an analytical tool, for its meaning shifts with changes in the character of society and in the underlying values and interests of the varied scholars and policymakers who invoke it. It is thus a distinctively social, rather than legal, concept, one suffused with vagueness and ambiguity.



White-Collar and Organized Crime [next] [back] White-Collar Crime - Healthcare Fraud, Government Fraud, Financial Institution Fraud, Frank W. Abagnale, Telemarketing Fraud

User Comments

Your email address will be altered so spam harvesting bots can't read it easily.
Hide my email completely instead?

Cancel or

Vote down Vote up

almost 7 years ago

White collar crimes are marked solely by the fact that they involved transfers of payment/services just as any ordinary transaction of financial value occurs, and that is what makes them so difficult to investigate.

The underlying transaction which determines legitmacy vs illegitimacy, whether couched in propriety and innocence, or in criminal initiative to create or further crimes is the critical juncture of whether the outcome can be considered ordinary trade or illegal violation of law.

The victim, perceived through the eyes of transaction based legitimatcy is irrelevant to the crime, or the type of entity scammed - person, organization, or company.

Viewed through the lens of legitimacy, authenticity, and honesty, white collar crime is class-independent, and victim-independent - never having to rely upon the distinction of mafia racketeering vs professional crimes; in a sense, without legitimacy they are all simply blue collar crimes of varying levels of coercion, whether by force or by deception.