In recent years, through changes in trial rules in some states, the American public has been able to get beyond newspaper coverage of criminal trials and actually watch selected criminal trials on television. Some of these trials have proven very controversial and have sparked considerable interest in our criminal trial system.
WILLIAM T. PIZZI
See also ADVERSARY SYSTEM; BURDEN OF PROOF; CIVIL AND CRIMINAL DIVIDE; CONFESSIONS; COUNSEL: ROLE OF COUNSEL; CRIMINAL JUSTICE PROCESS; CRIMINAL PROCEDURE: CONSTITUTIONAL ASPECTS; CRIMINAL PROCEDURE: COMPARATIVE ASPECTS; CROSS-EXAMINATION; DISCOVERY; EXCLUSIONARY RULE; JURY: BEHAVIORAL ASPECTS; JURY: LEGAL ASPECTS; PUBLICITY IN CRIMINAL CASES; VENUE.
CASES
Apodaca v. Oregon, 406 U.S. 404 (1972).
Griffin v. California, 380 U.S. 609 (1965).
In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358 (1970).
Lowenfeld v. Phelps, 484 U.S. 231, 235 (1988).
Rideau v. Louisiana, 373 U.S. (1963).
Sheppard v. Maxwell, 384 U.S. 333 (1966).
United States v. Spock, 416 F.2d 165 (1st Cir. 1969).
User Comments Add a comment…