Winters v. United States
Significance, Water For The Pursuit Of "civilization", A Special Right, Impact, Reservation Populations
Appellants
Henry Winters, John W. Acker, Chris Cruse, Agnes Downs and the Empire Cattle Company
Appellee
United States
Appellants' Claim
That appropriated water rights to the Milk River of Montana were valid and had priority over those of the Fort Belknap Native Americans and the United States.
Chief Lawyer for Appellants
Edward C. Day
Chief Lawyer for Appellee
Sanford, Assistant Attorney General
Justices for the Court
William Rufus Day, Melville Weston Fuller, John Marshall Harlan I, Joseph McKenna (writing for the Court), Oliver Wendell Holmes, William Henry Moody, Rufus Wheeler Peckham, Edward Douglass White
Justices Dissenting
David Josiah Brewer
Place
Washington, D.C.
Date of Decision
6 January 1908
Decision
Found in favor of the United States affirming two lower court decisions that the tribes held implied water rights through their agreement with the United States that took priority over latter nearby settlers.
Related Cases
- United States v. Winans, 198 U.S. 371 (1905).
- Arizona v. California, 373 U.S. 546 (1963).
- Cappaert v. United States, 426 U.S. 128 (1976).
Sources
Statistical Abstract of the United States 1997. Washington, DC: U.S. Government, 1997.
Additional topics
- Yick Wo v. Hopkins - Significance
- Wilson v. New - Significance, The Eight-hour Workday
- Winters v. United States - Significance
- Winters v. United States - Further Readings
- Winters v. United States - Water For The Pursuit Of "civilization"
- Winters v. United States - A Special Right
- Winters v. United States - Impact
- Winters v. United States - Reservation Populations
- Other Free Encyclopedias
Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1883 to 1917