Other Free Encyclopedias » Law Library - American Law and Legal Information » Notable Trials and Court Cases - 1883 to 1917

Wilson v. New - Significance, The Eight-hour Workday

court missouri railway john

Appellant

Francis M. Wilson, U.S. Attorney for the Western District of Missouri

Appellees

Alexander New and Henry C. Ferris, as Receivers of the Missouri, Oklahoma, & Gulf Railway Company

Appellant's Claim

The act of 3 September 1916 entitled "An Act to establish an eight-hour day for employees of carriers engaged in interstate and foreign commerce, and for other purposes" is constitutional and is aimed at establishing an eight-hour standard for work and wages and establishing a minimum wage.

Chief Lawyers for Appellant

John William Davis, U.S. Solicitor General; Frank Hagerman; E. Marvin Underwood; Thomas W. Gregory, U.S. Attorney General

Chief Lawyers for Appellees

Walker D. Hines, John G. Johnson, Arthur Miller

Justices for the Court

Louis D. Brandeis, John Hessin Clarke, Oliver Wendell Holmes, Joseph McKenna, Edward Douglass White (writing for the Court)

Justices Dissenting

William Rufus Day, James Clark McReynolds, Mahlon Pitney, Willis Van Devanter

Place

Washington, D.C.

Date of Decision

19 March 1917

Decision

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Missouri to review a decree which enjoined the enforcement of a statute fixing an eight-hour workday for, and temporally regulating the ages of, railway employees engaged in the operation of trains upon interstate railway carriers. Reversed and remanded, with directions to dismiss the bill.

Sources

Levitan, Sara A., and Richard S. Belous. Shorter Hours, Shorter Weeks. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1977.

Further Readings

  • Biskupic, Joan, and Elder Witt, eds. Congressional Quarterly's Guide to the U.S. Supreme Court, 3rd ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly, Inc., 1996.
  • Hall, Kermit L., ed. The Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court. New York: Oxford University Press, p. 636.
Winters v. United States - Significance, Water For The Pursuit Of "civilization", A Special Right, Impact, Reservation Populations [next] [back] William Breckinridge Breach of Promise Trial: 1894 - A Relationship Blossoms, A Promise Broken, A Trial Watched By The Nation, Defense Portrays Pollard As A Harlot

User Comments

Your email address will be altered so spam harvesting bots can't read it easily.
Hide my email completely instead?

Cancel or