Goldberg v. Kelly
The Principles Involved, What Happened, Procedural Due Process
Appellants
John Kelly, et al.
Appellee
Jack R. Goldberg, Commissioner of Social Services of the city of New York
Appellants' Claim
State and city welfare officials were terminating financial aid without prior notice and hearing, violating due process.
Chief Lawyer for Appellants
Lee A. Albert
Chief Lawyer for Appellee
John J. Loflin, Jr.
Justices for the Court
William J. Brennan, Jr. (writing for the Court), John Marshall Harlan II, William O. Douglas, Thurgood Marshall, Harry A. Blackmun, Byron R. White
Justices Dissenting
Hugo Lafayette Black, Warren E. Burger, Potter Stewart
Place
Washington, D.C.
Date of Decision
23 March 1970
Decision
Since New York's public assistance termination procedure did not allow the payment recipients to be heard before the cancellation, it violated the procedural due process.
Significance
Goldberg v. Kelly changed the constitutional opinion regarding traditional distinction between rights and privileges in relation to the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause.
Related Cases
- Goss v. Lopez, 419 U.S. 565 (1975).
- Mathews v. Eldredge, 424 U.S. 319 (1976).
- Lockett v. Ohio, 438 U.S. 586 (1978).
- Honday v. Oberg, 114 S. Ct. 2331 (1994).
Further Readings
- Seidman, Louis M., Gerald R. Stone, Cass R. Sunstein, and Mark V. Tushnet. Constitutional Law. Little, Brown and Company, 1986.
Additional topics
- Graham v. Richardson - Significance
- Gideon v. Wainwright - Significance, Court Unanimously Votes To Overturn Betts V. Brady, The Warren Court, Further Readings
- Goldberg v. Kelly - The Principles Involved
- Goldberg v. Kelly - What Happened
- Goldberg v. Kelly - Procedural Due Process
- Other Free Encyclopedias
Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1963 to 1972