Pennhurst State School & Hospital v. Halderman
Significance, The Developmentally Disabled Assistance And Bill Of Rights Act, Further Readings
Petitioner
Pennhurst State School & Hospital
Respondent
Terri Lee Halderman
Petitioner's Claim
That the federal court cannot award injunctive relief against state officials where the relief is justified through state law.
Chief Lawyer for Petitioner
H. Bartow Farr III
Chief Lawyer for Respondent
Thomas K. Gilhool
Justices for the Court
Warren E. Burger, Sandra Day O'Connor, Lewis F. Powell, Jr. (writing for the Court), William H. Rehnquist, Byron R. White
Justices Dissenting
Harry A. Blackmun, William J. Brennan, Jr., Thurgood Marshall, John Paul Stevens
Place
Washington, D.C.
Date of Decision
23 January 1984
Decision
The Eleventh Amendment of the Constitution bars federal courts from granting an injunction ordering state officials to conform their conduct to state law.
Related Cases
- Ex Parte Young, 209 U.S. 123 (1908).
- Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley Authority, 297 U.S. 288 (1936).
- Hutto v. Finney, 437 U.S. 678 (1978).
Sources
Bradley, David, and Shelley Fisher Fishkin, eds. The Encyclopedia of Civil Rights in America. Armonk, NY: Sharpe, 1998.
Additional topics
- Philadelphia Newspapers Inc. v. Hepps - Significance, Freedom To Defame, Chilling Effect, Private Citizens And Public Figures, Impact, Shield Laws
- Pennell v. San Jose - Significance, "hardship Tenants" A Landlord's Hardship?, Impact, Rent Control
- Pennhurst State School Hospital v. Halderman - Significance
- Pennhurst State School Hospital v. Halderman - Further Readings
- Pennhurst State School Hospital v. Halderman - The Developmentally Disabled Assistance And Bill Of Rights Act
- Other Free Encyclopedias
Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1981 to 1988