Other Free Encyclopedias » Law Library - American Law and Legal Information » Notable Trials and Court Cases - 1941 to 1953

Southern Pacific Co. v. Arizona - The Arizona Train Limit Law, Appeal To The U.s. Supreme Court, The Commerce Clause

appellant chief justices lawyer

Appellant

Southern Pacific Company

Appellee

State of Arizona

Appellant's Claim

That the Arizona Supreme Court erred in its ruling that the state's Train Limit Law was constitutional.

Chief Lawyer for Appellant

Burton Mason

Chief Lawyer for Appellee

Harold N. McLaughlin

Justices for the Court

Felix Frankfurter, Robert H. Jackson, Frank Murphy, Stanley Forman Reed, Owen Josephus Roberts, Wiley Blount Rutledge, Harlan Fiske Stone (writing for the Court)

Justices Dissenting

Hugo Lafayette Black, William O. Douglas

Place

Washington, D.C.

Date of Decision

18 June 1945

Decision

In favor of appellant, invalidating the Train Limit Law.

Significance

The Court ruled that state regulations which burden interstate commerce are unconstitutional.

Related Cases

  • Leisy v. Hardin, 135 U.S. 100 (1890).
  • Baldwin v. G. A. F. Seelig, Inc., 294 U.S. 511 (1935).
  • South Carolina State Highway Dept. v. Barnwell Brothers, Inc., 303 U.S. 177 (1938).

Sources

West's Encyclopedia of American Law. St. Paul, MN: West Group, 1998.

Sweatt v. Painter - Significance, Court Finds That "separate" Facilities Cannot Be "equal" [next] [back] Smith v. Allwright - Significance, Reconstruction, A Foot In The Door, A Final Test, An End To State-sponsored Political Discrimination

User Comments

Your email address will be altered so spam harvesting bots can't read it easily.
Hide my email completely instead?

Cancel or