Other Free Encyclopedias » Law Library - American Law and Legal Information » Notable Trials and Court Cases - 1637 to 1832

Eakin v. Raub - Significance, Marshall V. Gibson: Head To Head, Further Readings

claim plaintiffs court lawyer


James Eakin, et al.


Daniel Raub, et al.

Plaintiffs' Claim

That a state statute imposing a new period of limitations in which to bring a claim, as applied to bar plaintiff's claim, violated the state constitution, and that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court had the power to declare the statute void.

Chief Lawyer for Plaintiffs

B. Tilghman

Chief Defense Lawyer

Joseph Hemphill

Justices for the Court

Tilghman, Duncan

Justices Dissenting

John B. Gibson


Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Date of Decision

16 April 1825


That the state supreme court has the power to review legislative acts and, if contrary to the state constitution, declare such acts void.

Related Cases

  • Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803).
Fletcher v. Peck - Significance, Land Grabs And Corrupt Legislators, Innocent Third Parties, Contracts And The Constitution, Ex Post Facto Law [next] [back] Dorothy Talbye Trial: 1638

User Comments

Your email address will be altered so spam harvesting bots can't read it easily.
Hide my email completely instead?

Cancel or