Fletcher v. Peck
Significance, Land Grabs And Corrupt Legislators, Innocent Third Parties, Contracts And The Constitution, Ex Post Facto Law
Appellant
Robert Fletcher
Appellee
John Peck
Appellant's Claim
Peck had purchased some land from the state of Georgia, which he later sold to Fletcher. Subsequently, the Georgia state legislature rescinded the original sale to Peck. Fletcher's claim was that he had bought the land in good faith and that Peck was guilty of breach of contract.
Chief Lawyers for Appellant
Luther Martin
Chief Lawyer for Appellee
John Quincy Adams, Robert Goodloe Harper, Joseph Story
Justices for the Court
Samuel Chase, William Cushing, William Johnson, Henry Brockholst Livingston, John Marshall (writing for the Court), Thomas Todd, Bushrod Washington
Justices Dissenting
None
Place
Washington, D.C.
Date of Decision
16 March 1810
Decision
That a legislature could repeal or modify the acts of a preceding legislature, but it could not invalidate a previously made contract.
Related Cases
- Dartmouth College v. Woodward, 4 Wheat. 519 (1819).
- Sturges v. Crowninshield, 4 Wheat. 122 (1819).
- Charles River Bridge v. Warren Bridge, 11 Pet. 420 (1837).
- Dodge v. Woolsey, 18 How. 331 (1856).
Sources
Baltimore Law Review, Vol. 21, 1992.
Sources
Knappman, Edward W., ed. Great American Trials. Detroit, MI: Visible Ink Press, 1994.
Additional topics
- Foster v. Neilson - Significance
- Eakin v. Raub - Significance, Marshall V. Gibson: Head To Head, Further Readings
- Fletcher v. Peck - Significance
- Fletcher v. Peck - Further Readings
- Fletcher v. Peck - Land Grabs And Corrupt Legislators
- Fletcher v. Peck - Innocent Third Parties
- Fletcher v. Peck - Contracts And The Constitution
- Fletcher v. Peck - Ex Post Facto Law
- Fletcher v. Peck - Marvin Mandel Trial
- Other Free Encyclopedias
Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1637 to 1832