Other Free Encyclopedias » Law Library - American Law and Legal Information » Notable Trials and Court Cases - 1995 to Present

Clinton v. City of New York - Significance, The Line Item Veto, Presentment Clause Violated, Old Power Under New Name?, Impact

appellants decision court william

Appellants

President William J. Clinton and other government officials

Appellees

City of New York, Snake River Potato Growers, Inc., et al.

Appellants' Claim

That the Line Item Veto Act of 1996 delegating increased law making powers to the president by Congress was constitutional.

Chief Lawyer for Appellants

Seth P. Waxman, U.S. Solicitor General

Chief Lawyers for Appellees

Charles Cooper, Louis Cohen

Justices for the Court

Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Anthony M. Kennedy, William H. Rehnquist, David H. Souter, John Paul Stevens (writing for the Court), Clarence Thomas

Justices Dissenting

Stephen Breyer, Sandra Day O'Connor, Antonin Scalia

Place

Washington, D.C.

Date of Decision

25 June 1998

Decision

Ruled in favor of New York and affirmed a lower court decision by finding that the line-item veto law violated constitutional procedures for making laws.

Related Cases

  • Bryant v. Yellen, 447 U.S. 352 (1980).
  • Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Chadha, 462 U.S. 919 (1983).
  • Raines v. Byrd, 521 U.S. 811 (1997).

Sources

Bacon, Donald C., et al., eds. The Encyclopedia of the United States Congress. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1995.

Clinton v. Jones - Significance, Court Rejects Immunity Claim, Should Civil Suits Against The President Be Stalled Until He Is Out Of Office? [next] [back] City of Boerne v. Flores - Significance, Court Limits Scope Of Congressional Power, Impact, Religious Freedom Restoration Act, Further Readings

User Comments

Your email address will be altered so spam harvesting bots can't read it easily.
Hide my email completely instead?

Cancel or