Other Free Encyclopedias » Law Library - American Law and Legal Information » Notable Trials and Court Cases - 1918 to 1940

Selective Draft Law Cases - Significance, A "supreme And Noble Duty", Further Readings

appellants united justices claim


Joseph F. Arver, et al.


United States of America

Appellants' Claim

That the Selective Draft Act of 1917 violated Article I, Section 8 and the First and Thirteenth Amendments, among other provisions of the Constitution.

Chief Lawyers for Appellants

T. E. Latimer, Edwin T. Taliferro, Harry Weinberger

Chief Lawyer for Appellee

John W. Davis, Solicitor General

Justices for the Court

Louis D. Brandeis, John Hessin Clarke, William Rufus Day, Oliver Wendell Holmes, Joseph McKenna, James Clark McReynolds, Mahlon Pitney, Willis Van Devanter, Edward Douglass White (writing for the Court)

Justices Dissenting



Washington, D.C.

Date of Decision

7 January 1918


Denied the appellants' claim.

Related Cases

  • United States v. O'Brien, 391 U.S. 367 (1968).
  • Clay v. United States, 403 U.S. 698 (1971).
  • Rostker v. Goldberg, 453 U.S. 57 (1981).
  • Selective Service System v. Minnesota Public Interest Research Group, 468 U.S. 841 (1984).
Inc. South Carolina State Highway Department v. Barnwell Bros. - Significance, Intrastate And Interstate Interests Treated The Same, Future Restrictions On The States, Big Rig Road Hazards [next] [back] The Scottsboro Trials: 1931-37 - "legal Lynching … Victims Of 'capitalist Justice", "you Can't Mix Politics With Law"

User Comments

Your email address will be altered so spam harvesting bots can't read it easily.
Hide my email completely instead?

Cancel or

Vote down Vote up

about 11 years ago

Hey thanks for the great informaton, it is going be a great help to a debate we are going to have