Rosario v. Rockefeller
States' Rights, Party Raiding, Groups' Rights
Petitioner
Pedro J. Rosario, et al.
Respondent
Nelson Rockefeller, Governor of the State of New York, et al.
Petitioner's Claim
That New York State's law requiring voters to enroll in a party thirty days before a general election to vote in the following year's primary was unconstitutional.
Chief Lawyer for Petitioner
Burt Neuborne
Chief Lawyer for Respondent
A. Seth Greenwald
Justices for the Court
Harry A. Blackmun, Warren E. Burger, William H. Rehnquist, Potter Stewart (writing for the Court), Byron R. White
Justices Dissenting
William J. Brennan, Jr., William O. Douglas, Thurgood Marshall, Lewis F. Powell, Jr.
Place
Washington, D.C.
Date of Decision
21 March 1973
Decision
That the New York law did not discriminate against the petitioners, and was thus constitutional.
Significance
The case set a limit on what qualified as a "group" of people who could not be discriminated against in state regulation of voting. The Supreme Court determined that people who could have enrolled, but did not, did not constitute a group.
Related Cases
- NAACP v. Alabama, 357 U.S. 449 (1958).
- Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962).
- Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533 (1964).
- Wesberry v. Sanders, 376 U.S. 1 (1964).
- Carrington v. Rash, 380 U.S. 89 (1965).
- Shapiro v. Thompson, 394 U.S. 618 (1969).
- Dunn v. Blumstein, 405 U.S. 330 (1972).
Further Readings
- Biskupic, Joan, and Elder Witt, eds. Congressional Quarterly's Guide to the U.S. Supreme Court, 3rd ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly, Inc., 1996.
Additional topics
- Rummel v. Estelle - Three-time Loser, Cruel And Unusual?, The Nature Of Proportionality, Impact, Legal Malpractice
- Roe v. Wade - How To Use Milestones In The Law, This Case In History - ISSUE
- Rosario v. Rockefeller - States' Rights
- Rosario v. Rockefeller - Party Raiding
- Rosario v. Rockefeller - Groups' Rights
- Other Free Encyclopedias
Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1973 to 1980