Kirkpatrick v. Preisler
Significance
Appellants
James C. Kirkpatrick, Secretary of State of Missouri, et al.
Appellee
Paul W. Preisler
Appellants' Claim
The 1967 Missouri Redistricting Act was constitutional and any population variances between districts were justified.
Chief Lawyer for Appellants
Irving Actenberg
Chief Lawyer for Appellant
Thomas J. Downey
Justices for the Court
Hugo Lafayette Black, William J. Brennan, Jr. (writing for the Court), William O. Douglas, Abe Fortas, Thurgood Marshall, Earl Warren
Justices Dissenting
John Marshall Harlan II, Potter Stewart, Byron R. White
Place
Washington, D.C.
Date of Decision
7 April 1969
Decision
Missouri's Congressional Redistricting Act of 1967 was unconstitutional because of the variances in population among each district and the failure of the state to explain why such variances were unavoidable and justifiable.
Related Cases
- Colegrove v. Green, 328 U.S. 549 (1946).
- Wesberry v. Sanders, 376 U.S. 1 (1964).
- Mahan v. Howell, 410 U.S. 315 (1973).
- United Jewish Organizations v. Carey, 430 U.S. 144 (1977).
- Bush v. Vera, 517 U.S. 952 (1996).
- Abrams v. Johnson, 521 U.S. 74 (1997).
Further Readings
- Gunther, Gerald. Constitutional Law, 12th ed. New York: Foundation Press, 1991.
- Nowak, Rotunda, and Young. Constitutional Law, 3rd ed. New York: West, 1986.
- Engdahl, David Constitutional Power: Federal and State. New York: West, 1987.
Additional topics
- Lamont v. Postmaster General of the United States - Significance, Court Sets Broad Free Speech Protections, Impact, Related Cases, Further Readings
- King v. Smith - Significance, Further Readings
- Kirkpatrick v. Preisler - Significance
- Other Free Encyclopedias
Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1963 to 1972