Lamont v. Postmaster General of the United States
Significance, Court Sets Broad Free Speech Protections, Impact, Related Cases, Further Readings
Appellant
Corliss Lamont
Appellee
John F. Fixa, U.S. Postmaster General
Appellant's Claim
That a federal statute requiring the postmaster to destroy any mail from foreign countries determined to be communist propaganda unless the addressee returns a reply card indicating his desire to receive the mail violated his free speech rights under the First Amendment.
Chief Lawyer for Appellant
Leonard B. Boudin
Chief Lawyer for Appellee
Archibald Cox, U.S. Solicitor General
Justices for the Court
Hugo Lafayette Black, William J. Brennan, Jr., Tom C. Clark, William O. Douglas (writing for the Court), Arthur Goldberg, John Marshall Harlan II, Potter Stewart, Earl Warren
Justices Dissenting
None (Byron R. White did not participate)
Place
Washington, D.C.
Date of Decision
24 May 1965
Decision
That the statute requiring the addressee to return a reply card in order to receive mail designated as communist propaganda infringed on the addressee's unfettered right to free speech under the First Amendment.
Additional topics
- Lee v. Washington - The Facts Of The Case, The Supreme Court Rules, Concurring Opinion, Prisoner Lawsuits, Further Readings
- Kirkpatrick v. Preisler - Significance
- Lamont v. Postmaster General of the United States - Further Readings
- Lamont v. Postmaster General of the United States - Significance
- Lamont v. Postmaster General of the United States - Court Sets Broad Free Speech Protections
- Lamont v. Postmaster General of the United States - Impact
- Lamont v. Postmaster General of the United States - Related Cases
- Other Free Encyclopedias
Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1963 to 1972