South Carolina v. Katzenbach
Significance, Congress Passes The Voting Rights Act, South Carolina Challenges Voting Rights Act, Related Cases
Plaintiff
State of South Carolina
Defendant
Nicholas B. Katzenbach, U.S. Attorney General
Plaintiff's Claim
That certain portions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 relating to eligibility tests for voters, voter qualifications, and appointment of federal voting examiners, are invalid.
Chief Lawyers for Plaintiff
David W. Robinson II, Daniel R. McLeod
Chief Defense Lawyer
Nicholas B. Katzenbach, U.S. Attorney General
Justices for the Court
Hugo Lafayette Black, William J. Brennan, Jr., Tom C. Clark, William O. Douglas, Abe Fortas, John Marshall Harlan II, Potter Stewart, Earl Warren (writing for the Court), Byron R. White
Justices Dissenting
None
Place
Washington, D.C.
Date of Decision
7 March 1966
Decision
That the challenged provisions of the Voting Rights Act were consistent with the power of Congress to eliminate racial discrimination in voting under the Fifteenth Amendment to the Constitution.
Sources
Grilliot, Harold J., and Frank A. Schubert. Introduction to Law and the Legal System. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Co., 1992.
"Voting Rights Act Clarification," http://www.usdoj.gov/crt/voting/clarify3.htm.
Additional topics
- Stanley v. Georgia - Obscene Materials, Privacy And The First Amendment, Impact, Related Cases
- Sirhan Bishara Sirhan Trial: 1969 - A Murder Plan, Cynical Performance, Suggestions For Further Reading
- South Carolina v. Katzenbach - Further Readings
- South Carolina v. Katzenbach - Significance
- South Carolina v. Katzenbach - Congress Passes The Voting Rights Act
- South Carolina v. Katzenbach - South Carolina Challenges Voting Rights Act
- South Carolina v. Katzenbach - Related Cases
- South Carolina v. Katzenbach - Voting Rights Act Of 1965
- Other Free Encyclopedias
Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1963 to 1972