Washington v. Seattle School District - Significance, A Thorny Problem, Resistance To Change, Legal Remedies, The Power Of The State
appellants court william decision
Appellants
State of Washington, et al.
Appellees
Seattle School District Number 1, et al.
Appellants' Claim
That Initiative 350, a state law prohibiting busing of school children under certain circumstances, was constitutional and binding upon the Seattle school system.
Chief Lawyer for Appellants
Kenneth O. Eikenberry
Chief Lawyer for Appellees
Michael W. Hoge
Justices for the Court
Harry A. Blackmun (writing for the Court), William J. Brennan, Jr., Thurgood Marshall, John Paul Stevens, Byron R. White
Justices Dissenting
Warren E. Burger, Sandra Day O'Connor, Lewis F. Powell, Jr. William H. Rehnquist
Place
Washington, D.C.
Date of Decision
30 June 1982
Decision
Affirmed the rulings of two lower courts, holding that Initiative 350 violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment by creating an unconstitutional classification based solely on race.
Related Cases
- Hunter v. Erickson, 393 U.S. 391 (1969).
- Milliken v. Bradley, 418 U.S. 769 (1974).
- Crawford v. Board of Education of Los Angeles, 458 U.S. 527 (1982).
Further Readings
- Hall, Kermit L., ed. The Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court of the United States. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.
- Rosen, Jeffrey. "Stare Indecisis: Harry Blackmun v. CCRI." The New Republic, December 23, 1996, p. 14.
- Stearns, Maxwell L. "The Misguided Renaissance of Social Choice." Yale Law Journal, March 1994, p. 1219.
User Comments