Plessy v. Ferguson
Significance, "separate But Equal", Further Readings
Petitioner
Homer A. Plessy
Respondent
J. H. Ferguson, New Orleans Criminal District Court Judge
Petitioner's Claim
That Louisiana's law requiring blacks to ride in separate railroad cars violated Plessy's right to equal protection under the law.
Chief Lawyers for Petitioner
F. D. McKenney, S. F. Phillips
Chief Lawyer for Respondent
M. J. Cunningham, Louisiana Attorney General
Justices for the Court
Henry Billings Brown (writing for the Court), Stephen Johnson Field, Melville Weston Fuller, Horace Gray, Rufus Wheeler Peckham, George Shiras, Jr., Edward Douglass White
Justices Dissenting
John Marshall Harlan I (David Josiah Brewer did not participate)
Place
Washington, D.C.
Date of Decision
18 May 1896
Decision
That laws providing for "separate but equal" treatment of blacks and whites were constitutional.
Related Cases
- Strauder v. West Virginia, 100 U.S. 303 (1879).
- Civil Rights Cases, 109 U.S. 3 (1883).
- Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356 (1886).
- Missouri ex rel. Gaines v. Canada, 305 U.S. 337 (1938).
- Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).
Sources
Bradley, David and Shelley Fisher Fishkin eds. The Encyclopedia of Civil Rights in America. Armonk, NY: Sharpe, 1998.
Additional topics
- Plessy v. Ferguson: 1896
- Pacific States Telephone Telegraph Company v. Oregon - Significance, Progressive Politics On Trial, The Political Question Doctrine Since Pacific States, Further Readings
- Plessy v. Ferguson - Significance
- Plessy v. Ferguson - Further Readings
- Plessy v. Ferguson - "separate But Equal"
- Other Free Encyclopedias
Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1883 to 1917