Youngberg v. Romeo
Significance
Petitioners
Duane Youngberg, Superintendent, Penhurst State School and Hospital, et al.
Respondents
Nicholas Romeo, an incompetent, by his mother, Paula Romeo
Petitioners' Claim
That the proper standard of liability is the Eighth Amendment, and that the Pennsylvania State Institution properly adhered to the standards of the law in treating the respondent's son, a severely mentally handicapped individual.
Chief Lawyer for Petitioners
David H. Allshouse
Chief Lawyer for Respondents
Edmond A. Tiryak
Justices for the Court
Harry A. Blackmun, William J. Brennan, Jr., Warren E. Burger, Thurgood Marshall, Sandra Day O'Connor, Lewis F. Powell, Jr. (writing for the Court), William H. Rehnquist, John Paul Stevens, Byron R. White
Justices Dissenting
None
Place
Washington, D.C.
Date of Decision
18 June 1982
Decision
Involuntarily committed retarded persons were held to have due process liberty interests requiring state to provide minimally adequate training to ensure safety and freedom from undue restraint.
Related Cases
- Ingram v. Wright, 430 U.S. 651 (1977).
- Hutto v. Finney, 437 U.S. 678 (1978).
- Harris v. McRae, 448 U.S. 297 (1980).
Further Readings
- "Due Process of Law; Incompetent or Insane Persons; Mental Illness." AIR Quick Index.
Additional topics
- Wygant v. Jackson Board of Education - Significance, Further Readings
- Youngberg v. Romeo - Significance
- Other Free Encyclopedias
Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1981 to 1988