Inc. v. Scheidler National Organization for Women
Significance, Access V. Protest, A New Reading Of Rico, A Chilling Effect, Impact
Petitioner
National Organization for Women, Inc. (NOW); Delaware Women's Health Organization, Inc. (DWHO); Summit Women's Health Organization, Inc. (SWHO)
Respondent
Joseph Scheidler, Pro-Life Action Network (PLAN), et al.
Petitioner's Claim
That respondents belonged to a nationwide conspiracy to shut down abortion clinics in violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) chapter of the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970.
Chief Lawyer for Petitioner
Fay Clayton
Chief Lawyer for Respondent
Robert Blakey
Justices for the Court
Harry A. Blackmun, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Anthony M. Kennedy, Sandra Day O'Connor, William H. Rehnquist (writing for the Court), Antonin Scalia, David H. Souter, John Paul Stevens, Clarence Thomas
Justices Dissenting
None
Place
Washington, D.C.
Date of Decision
24 January 1994
Decision
That attempts by the anti-abortion groups in question to hinder the business of the abortion clinics constituted racketeering, even though there was no economic purpose behind such activities; therefore the respondents could be charged under the RICO provisions.
Additional topics
- National Treasury Employees Union v. Von Raab - Significance, Impact, Further Readings
- Mistretta v. United States - Significance, The Sentencing Reform Act Comes Under Challenge, "an Unusual Hybrid", Dissent: "a Sort Of Junior-varsity Congress"
- Inc. v. Scheidler National Organization for Women - Significance
- Inc. v. Scheidler National Organization for Women - Further Readings
- Inc. v. Scheidler National Organization for Women - Access V. Protest
- Inc. v. Scheidler National Organization for Women - A New Reading Of Rico
- Inc. v. Scheidler National Organization for Women - A Chilling Effect
- Inc. v. Scheidler National Organization for Women - Impact
- Inc. v. Scheidler National Organization for Women - Related Cases
- Other Free Encyclopedias
Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1989 to 1994