Maher v. Roe
Significance, Doctor's Certification Needed, Not A Protected Class, A Distressing Insensitivity, Legal Consequences Of Maher V. Roe
Appellant
Maher, Connecticut Commissioner of Social Services
Appellees
Mary Poe, Susan Roe
Appellant's Claim
That the Connecticut Welfare Department regulation that limits state Medicaid benefits for first trimester abortions to those that are "medically necessary" violates the Fourteenth Amendment rights of low-income women to equal protection under the law, since the state did provide Medicaid benefits to cover childbirth expenses.
Chief Lawyer for Appellant
Lucy V. Katz
Chief Lawyer for Appellees
Edmund C. Walsh, Assistant Attorney General of Connecticut
Justices for the Court
Warren E. Burger, Lewis F. Powell, Jr. (writing for the Court), William H. Rehnquist, John Paul Stevens, Potter Stewart, Byron R. White
Justices Dissenting
Harry A. Blackmun, William J. Brennan, Jr., Thurgood Marshall
Place
Washington, D.C.
Date of Decision
20 June 1977
Decision
That states have a right to favor childbirth over abortion by funding one under Medicaid while refusing to fund the other.
Additional topics
- Marvin Mandel Trial: 1977 - Tried, Convicted, And Ultimately Acquitted
- Mahan v. Howell - Significance, What Is The Percentage?, Home-port Or Home Address?, Flexibility And Local Control
- Maher v. Roe - Significance
- Maher v. Roe - Further Readings
- Maher v. Roe - Doctor's Certification Needed
- Maher v. Roe - Not A Protected Class
- Maher v. Roe - A Distressing Insensitivity
- Maher v. Roe - Legal Consequences Of Maher V. Roe
- Maher v. Roe - Related Cases
- Other Free Encyclopedias
Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1973 to 1980