Rotary International v. Rotary Club of Duarte Board of Directors - Significance, Local California Rotary Chapter Creates "international" Incident, Membership Originally Open To Men Only
william petitioner business court
Petitioner
Board of Directors, Rotary International
Respondent
Rotary Club of Duarte
Petitioner's Claim
That a California law prohibiting gender discrimination in business organizations violates the First Amendment right to freedom of association.
Chief Lawyer for Petitioner
Judith Resnik
Chief Lawyer for Respondent
William P. Sutter
Justices for the Court
William J. Brennan, Jr., Thurgood Marshall, Lewis F. Powell, Jr. (writing for the Court), William H. Rehnquist, Antonin Scalia, John Paul Stevens, Byron R. White
Justices Dissenting
None (Harry A. Blackmun and Sandra Day O'Connor did not participate)
Place
Washington, D.C.
Date of Decision
4 May 1987
Decision
A California law requiring full and equal accommodations to both sexes in business establishments is constitutional and does not violate the First Amendment when applied to a broad-based business and professional organization.
Related Cases
- Roberts v. United States Jaycees, 468 U.S. 609 (1984).
- Beynon v. St. George-Dixie Lodge No. 1783, Benev. & Protective Order of Elks, 854 P.2d 513 (1993).
- South Boston Allied War Veterans Council v. City of Boston, 875 F.Supp. 891 (1995).
Further Readings
- Baldwin, Gordon B. "The Library Bill of Rights--A Critique." Library Trends, summer 1996, p. 7.
- Biskupic, Joan, and Elder Witt, eds. Congressional Quarterly's Guide to the U.S. Supreme Court, 3rd ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly, Inc., 1996.
User Comments
over 3 years ago
Excellent information. I have been a Rotarian for more than 25 years. RI encourages female mebership now, but RI is conveniently silent about how it had achange of heart. Well, it was a forced change!
The arguments put forth by RI at the time to twart female members are shocking!