Cleveland Board of Education v. LaFleur - Significance, Mandatory Maternity Leave, A Violation Of Due Process?, Impact, Maternity Leave, Further Readings
petitioners court william school
Petitioners
Cleveland Board of Education, et al.
Respondents
Jo Carol LaFleur, Ann Elizabeth Nelson
Petitioners' Claim
That a school board policy mandating that pregnant teachers go on an unpaid leave of absence beginning five months before the expected birth of the child and ending the school semester after the child is three months old was constitutional under the Fourteenth Amendment.
Chief Lawyer for Petitioners
Charles F. Clarke
Chief Lawyer for Respondents
Jane M. Picker
Justices for the Court
Harry A. Blackmun, William J. Brennan, Jr., William O. Douglas, Thurgood Marshall, Lewis F. Powell, Jr., Potter Stewart (writing for the Court), Byron R. White
Justices Dissenting
Warren E. Burger, William H. Rehnquist
Place
Washington, D.C.
Date of Decision
21 January 1974
Decision
Denied the petitioners' claim and upheld the ruling of the court of appeals that the school board's policy regarding mandatory unpaid leave for pregnant teachers violated the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and was not legally binding.
Related Cases
- Prince v. Massachusetts, 321 U.S. 158 (1944).
- Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965).
- Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973).
- Geduldig v. Aiello, 417 U.S. 484 (1974).
Sources
Eberlein, Tamara. "Get the Best Maternity Leave for You (and Your Baby)." Redbook, December 1997.
Sturgeon, Jeff. "General Electric Workers' Suit Paved Way for Paid Maternity Leave." Knight-Ridder/Tribune Business News, 12 October 1998.
User Comments
over 2 years ago
i was trying to find the number for cleve. board of education -my kids go to cleve. schools and i have to call them thank you