Central Hudson Gas and Electric Corp. v. Public Service Commission of NewYork
Significance, The Four-part Test, Questioning The Four-part Test, Further Readings
Appellant
Central Hudson Gas and Electric Corp.
Appellee
Public Service Commission of New York
Appellant's Claim
That a regulation by the New York Public Service Commission, banning the use of promotional advertising by the electrical utility Central Hudson Gas and Electric Corp., was a restraint of commercial speech under the First and Fourteenth Amendments.
Chief Lawyer for the Appellant
Telford Taylor
Chief Lawyer for the Appellee
Peter H. Schiff
Justices for the Court
Harry A. Blackmun, William J. Brennan, Jr., Warren E. Burger, Thurgood Marshall, Lewis F. Powell, Jr. (writing for the Court), John Paul Stevens, Potter Stewart, Byron R. White
Justices Dissenting
William H. Rehnquist
Place
Washington, D.C.
Date of Decision
20 June 1980
Decision
The Court reversed the judgment of the New York Court of Appeals, and found that the restraint of commercial speech was a violation of the appellant's rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments.
Related Cases
- Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, 425 U.S. 748 (1976).
- 44 Liquormart, Inc. v. Rhode Island, 517 U.S. 484 (1996).
Additional topics
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LaFleur - Significance, Mandatory Maternity Leave, A Violation Of Due Process?, Impact, Maternity Leave, Further Readings
- Califano v. Goldfarb - Significance
- Central Hudson Gas and Electric Corp. v. Public Service Commission of NewYork - Further Readings
- Central Hudson Gas and Electric Corp. v. Public Service Commission of NewYork - Significance
- Central Hudson Gas and Electric Corp. v. Public Service Commission of NewYork - The Four-part Test
- Central Hudson Gas and Electric Corp. v. Public Service Commission of NewYork - Questioning The Four-part Test
- Other Free Encyclopedias
Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1973 to 1980