Other Free Encyclopedias » Law Library - American Law and Legal Information » Notable Trials and Court Cases - 1973 to 1980

Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. Murgia - Significance, Rationality Of Mandatory Retirement, Not The Best Means . . . But Rational Means, Impact

appellant public robert appellee

Appellant

Massachusetts Board of Retirement, et al.

Appellee

Robert D. Murgia

Appellant's Claim

The state of Massachusetts Board of Retirement believed their provision for mandatory retirement of police officers at age 50 was rationally related to the interest of protecting the public and therefore did not violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Chief Lawyer for Appellant

Terence P. O'Malley

Chief Lawyer for Appellee

Robert D. City

Justices for the Court

Harry A. Blackmun, William J. Brennan, Jr., Warren E. Burger, Lewis F. Powell, Jr., William H. Rehnquist, Potter Stewart, Byron R. White (unsigned)

Justices Dissenting

Thurgood Marshall (John Paul Stevens did not participate)

Place

Washington, D.C.

Date of Decision

25 June 1976

Decision

There was no violation of the Equal Protection Clause: the state of Massachusetts' mandatory retirement provision rationally furthered its purpose of protecting the public by assuring physical fitness of the state police officers.

Related Cases

  • Shapiro v. Thompson, 394 U.S. 618 (1969).
  • Dandridge v. Williams, 397 U.S. 471 (1970).
  • San Antonio School District v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 1 (1973).
  • McIlvaine v. Pennsylvania, 415 U.S. 986 (1974).
  • Cannon v. Guste, 423 U.S. 918 (1975).
  • Weisbrod v. Lynn, 420 U.S. 940 (1975).

Sources

"Supreme Court Raises Barrier to Forced Retirement Rules." Criminal Justice Newsletter, July 15, 1985, pp. 1-2.

Further Readings

  • Jackson, Vicki C. "Coeur d'Alene, Federal Courts and the Supremacy of Federal Law." Constitutional Commentary, summer 1998, p. 301.
  • Tushnet, Mark V. "Justice Lewis F. Powell, Jr.: A Biography." Michigan Law Review, May 1995, p. 1854.
Mathews v. Eldridge - Significance, Due Process Is Flexible, Hearing Should Come Before Termination Of Benefits, Impact [next] [back] The Marvin V. Marvin "Palimony" Suit: 1979 - Trial Enthralls Spectators, Career Claim Fails, Suggestions For Further Reading

User Comments

Your email address will be altered so spam harvesting bots can't read it easily.
Hide my email completely instead?

Cancel or

Vote down Vote up

over 6 years ago

Please, permit me to inform you of my desire of entering into business relationship with you for mutual benefit.
Hi my name is Martins Ugo, I am a manager of f1delitytrustbank in the uk since 2002,The sum of $950,000.00 was transfer to my branch in uk,This fund belonged to an overseas contractor name Mr.ADAM SANDLER who is based in the us The said contractor was involved in an automobile accident along Lagos ibadan express way in Nigeria on Saturday december 20th 2009 where his wife and only Son died as they were all traveling in the same car. There is no next of kin to the deceased as contained in the bank records and so, this fund has been kept in the dormant vaults of the bank for a long time now as unclaimed.
Upon getting these discoveries, I decided to embark on search via the internet in an effort to get to any of his family members or extended relative. This has been unsuccessful up until now.
Meanwhile, I desire to present you to the bank here now as the next of kin to the late Mr.ADAM SANDLER so that you can apply for claims of this fund being that you are from the same country just like the deceased and so, there is a possibility of some relationship between you.
I am here to guide you accordingly with the relevant issues at stake to present you as rightful beneficiary of this fund to ensure maximum success in this pursuit for our collective gain. All I require from you now is your wholehearted cooperation to enable us claim this fund successfully. Therefore, upon receipt of your positive response soon, we shall discuss on the sharing ratio and modalities of transfer of this fund to your favour.
Be informed that I have all relevant information and legal documents needed to back you up to facilitate this claim risk-free. if really you wanna see i will send you the bank detail so you can verify yourself and you will see the money..
Therefore, I await your response as soon as possible with the following detailed information about yourself:
Full Name..........................
Age....................................
Occupation........................
Marital status....................
Nationality of origin.....................
Phone number.. ................
Private E:mail......................
Please note! these information about yourself will enable me know you better as my intended business partner, and to also be able to communicate you better. you can email me back on ( martins_20101@yahoo.com )