Moose Lodge No. v. Irvis (107 )
Significance, The Issues At Stake, The Supreme Court Decides
Appellant
Moose Lodge No. 107
Appellee
Leroy Irvis
Appellant's Claim
That discrimination against an African American man by a private lodge is not "state action" because the state granted the lodge a liquor license.
Chief Lawyer for Appellant
Frederick Bernays Wiener
Chief Lawyer for Appellee
Harry J. Rubin
Justices for the Court
Harry A. Blackmun, Warren E. Burger, Lewis F. Powell, Jr., William H. Rehnquist (writing for the Court), Potter Stewart, Byron R. White
Justices Dissenting
William J. Brennan, Jr., William O. Douglas, Thurgood Marshall
Place
Washington, D.C.
Date of Decision
12 June 1972
Decision
The Moose Lodge is a private club in which the state takes no controlling interest. Therefore, discrimination by the club cannot be outlawed under federal law.
Related Cases
- The Civil Rights Cases, 109 U.S. 3 (1883).
- Shelley v. Kraemer, 334 U.S. 1 (1948).
- Burton v. Wilmington Parking Authority, 365 U.S. 715 (1961).
- Reitman v. Mulkey, 387 U.S. 369 (1967).
Further Readings
- Bartholomew, Paul Charles. Summaries of Leading Cases on the Constitution. Totowa, NJ: Rowan & Allanheld, 1983.
- Ducat, Craig R., and Harold W. Chase. Constitutional Interpretation. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Company, 1988.
- Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing Company, 1986.
Additional topics
- National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. Button - The Battle For Desegregation, The Naacp Sues, Petitioner's Claims, State's Interests Do Not Justify Suppression Of Speech
- Miranda v. Arizona - Significance, Tainted Evidence, Conviction Overturned, Impact, Miranda Rights, Further Readings
- Moose Lodge No. v. Irvis (107 ) - Significance
- Moose Lodge No. v. Irvis (107 ) - The Issues At Stake
- Moose Lodge No. v. Irvis (107 ) - The Supreme Court Decides
- Other Free Encyclopedias
Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1963 to 1972