National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. Button
The Battle For Desegregation, The Naacp Sues, Petitioner's Claims, State's Interests Do Not Justify Suppression Of Speech
Petitioner
NAACP
Respondent
Robert Y. Button, Attorney General of Virginia
Petitioner's Claim
That Chapter 33 of the Virginia Acts of Assembly, Extra Session 1956, violated its Fourteenth Amendment rights.
Chief Lawyer for Petitioner
Robert L. Carter
Chief Lawyer for Respondent
Henry T. Wickham
Justices for the Court
Hugo Lafayette Black, William J. Brennan, Jr. (writing for the Court), William O. Douglas, Arthur Goldberg, Earl Warren
Justices Dissenting
Tom C. Clark, John Marshall Harlan II, Potter Stewart, Byron R. White
Place
Washington, D.C.
Date of Decision
14 January 1963
Decision
The Court, reversing the decision of the Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals, held that Chapter 33 of the Virginia Acts of Assembly, Extra Session 1956, was unconstitutional because it violated the First and Fourteenth Amendments.
Significance
The decision affirmed the NAACP's freedoms of speech and association in the face of attacks from the state. The Virginia statute would have sharply curtailed the legal activities of the NAACP, which was working to desegregate schools by means of litigation.
Related Cases
- Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).
- National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama, 357 U.S. 449 (1958).
- Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Virginia State Bar, 377 U.S. 1 (1964).
- United Mine Workers v. Illinois State Bar Association, 389 U.S. 217 (1967).
Additional topics
- New York Times Company v. Sullivan: 1964 - Supreme Court Protects The Press, Suggestions For Further Reading
- Moose Lodge No. v. Irvis (107 ) - Significance, The Issues At Stake, The Supreme Court Decides
- National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. Button - Further Readings
- National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. Button - The Battle For Desegregation
- National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. Button - The Naacp Sues
- National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. Button - Petitioner's Claims
- National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. Button - State's Interests Do Not Justify Suppression Of Speech
- National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. Button - Professional Conduct Not Protected
- National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. Button - Impact
- Other Free Encyclopedias
Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1963 to 1972