Other Free Encyclopedias » Law Library - American Law and Legal Information » Notable Trials and Court Cases - 1963 to 1972

Shapiro v. Thompson - Significance, The Right To Interstate Travel, Legitimate Government Objectives?, Impact, Temporary Assistance For Needy Families

welfare district appellant lawyer

Appellant

Vivian Marie Thompson

Appellee

Shapiro, Commissioner of Welfare of Connecticut

Appellant's Claim

That the denial of state and the District of Columbia welfare benefits to residents of less than one year is discriminatory and violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Chief Lawyer for Appellee

Archibald Cox

Chief Lawyer for Appellant

Francis J. MacGregor

Justices for the Court

William J. Brennan, Jr. (writing for the Court), William O. Douglas, Abe Fortas, Thurgood Marshall, Potter Stewart, Byron R. White

Justices Dissenting

Hugo Lafayette Black, John Marshall Harlan II, Earl Warren

Place

Washington, D.C.

Date of Decision

21 April 1969

Decision

Affirmed the decisions of three district courts which found various state and District of Columbia welfare residency requirements unconstitutional.

Related Cases

  • The Passenger Cases, 7 How. 283, 492 (1849).
  • Dunn v. Blumstein, 405 U.S. 330 (1972).
  • Memorial Hospital v. Maricopa County, 415 U.S. 250 (1974).
  • Sosna v. Iowa, 419 U.S. 393 (1975).
  • Zobel v. Williams, 457 U.S. 55 (1982).
  • Attorney General v. Soto-Lopez, 476 U.S. 898 (1986).

Sources

Grigsby III, J. Eugene. "Welfare Reform Means Business as Usual." Journal of the American Planning Association, winter 1998.

Sherbert v. Verner - Legal Context, High Court Reverses, Dissenting Opinion, Sherbert Test [next] [back] See v. City of Seattle - Significance, Protection From Administrative Searches, Impact, Related Cases

User Comments

Your email address will be altered so spam harvesting bots can't read it easily.
Hide my email completely instead?

Cancel or