See v. City of Seattle
Significance, Protection From Administrative Searches, Impact, Related Cases
Appellant
See
Appellee
City of Seattle
Appellant's Claim
That the city of Seattle Fire Department must have a search warrant consistent with the safeguards against unreasonable search offered by the Fourth Amendment to perform a fire code inspection of a locked private warehouse.
Chief Lawyer for Appellant
Norman Dorsen
Chief Lawyer for Appellee
A. L. Newbould
Justices for the Court
Hugo Lafayette Black, William J. Brennan, Jr., William O. Douglas, Abe Fortas, Earl Warren, Byron R. White (writing for the Court)
Justices Dissenting
Tom C. Clark, John Marshall Harlan II, Potter Stewart
Place
Washington, D.C.
Date of Decision
5 June 1967
Decision
Upheld See's claim and overturned two lower courts' decisions allowing entry by the fire department over the owner's objections without a warrant.
Further Readings
- Biskupic, Joan, and Elder Witt. Guide to the U.S. Supreme Court. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly, 1997.
- "FAA Plans Tough Action Against Illegal Parts." Aviation Week & Space Technology, October 23, 1995.
- New York Times, April 17, 1994.
- "The Heat Seekers--Use of Thermal Imagery in Law Enforcement." The Nation, October 16, 1995.
Additional topics
- Shapiro v. Thompson - Significance, The Right To Interstate Travel, Legitimate Government Objectives?, Impact, Temporary Assistance For Needy Families
- Schneider v. Rusk - Significance, No "second Class Citizenship" Allowed, The Historical Record For Residency
- See v. City of Seattle - Significance
- See v. City of Seattle - Protection From Administrative Searches
- See v. City of Seattle - Impact
- See v. City of Seattle - Related Cases
- Other Free Encyclopedias
Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1963 to 1972