Ornelas v. United States
Significance, Scalia Dissents, Impact, Drug-sniffing Dogs
Petitioners
Saul Ornelas, Ismael Ornelas-Ledesma
Respondent
United States
Petitioners' Claim
Police lacked probable cause to conduct a search of their vehicle.
Chief Lawyer for Petitioners
Cornelia T. L. Pillard
Chief Lawyers for Respondent
Robert G. LeBell, Brian W. Gleason
Justices for the Court
Stephen Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Anthony M. Kennedy, Sandra Day O'Connor, William H. Rehnquist (writing for the Court), David H. Souter, John Paul Stevens, Clarence Thomas
Justices Dissenting
Antonin Scalia
Place
Washington, D.C.
Date of Decision
28 May 1996
Decision
The decision of the lower court was vacated and remanded for a full review of the facts.
Related Cases
- Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968).
- New York v. Belton, 453 U.S. 454 (1981).
- Nix v. Williams, 467 U.S. 431 (1984).
- California v. Acevedo, 500 U.S. 565 (1991).
Sources
Wallentine, Ken. "Introductory Canine Search and Seizure." http://www.minn.net/uspca.
Further Readings
- Lee, Cynthia K. Y. "A New `Sliding Scale of Deference' Approach to Abuse of Discretion." American Criminal Law Review, fall 1997, p. 1.
- Reuben, Richard C. "Police Under the Gun: Search and Seizure on the Docket Amid Tensions Over Police Conduct." ABA Journal, June 1996, p. 44.
- Slansky, David A. "Traffic Stops, Minority Motorists, and the Future of the Fourth Amendment." Supreme Court Review, annual 1997, p. 271.
Additional topics
- Maddox Pagones v. Sharpton Mason: 1997-98 - Fistfights In Court, A Ten-year Delay
- Oregon v. Mathiason - Significance, A Violation Of Miranda?, The Court Clarifies Miranda, Unfaithful To Miranda?, Impact
- Ornelas v. United States - Significance
- Ornelas v. United States - Scalia Dissents
- Ornelas v. United States - Impact
- Ornelas v. United States - Drug-sniffing Dogs
- Other Free Encyclopedias
Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1995 to Present