Other Free Encyclopedias » Law Library - American Law and Legal Information » Notable Trials and Court Cases - 1981 to 1988

Arizona v. Hicks - Significance, Impact, Further Readings

petitioner amendment william search


State of Arizona



Petitioner's Claim

That a search of Hicks's apartment was legal under the Fourth Amendment.

Chief Lawyer for Petitioner

Linda A. Akers

Chief Lawyer for Respondent

John W. Rood III

Justices for the Court

Harry A. Blackmun, William J. Brennan, Jr., Thurgood Marshall, Antonin Scalia (writing for the Court), John Paul Stevens, Byron R. White

Justices Dissenting

Lewis F. Powell, Jr., William H. Rehnquist, Sandra Day O'Connor


Washington, D.C.

Date of Decision

3 March 1987


Upheld two lower courts' decisions that the search was a violation of the Fourth Amendment.

Related Cases

  • Stanley v. Georgia, 394 U.S. 557 (1969).
  • Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443 (1971).
  • Mincey v. Arizona, 434 U.S. 1343 (1977).
  • Texas v. Brown, 460 U.S. 730 (1983).
  • Illinois v. Andreas, 463 U.S. 765 (1983).
  • Maryland v. Macon, 472 U.S. 463 (1985).
Batson v. Kentucky - Significance, Selecting The Jury, The Decision, Broadened In Scope, Further Readings [next] [back] Arizona Governing Committee v. Norris - Significance

User Comments

Your email address will be altered so spam harvesting bots can't read it easily.
Hide my email completely instead?

Cancel or