Massachusetts v. Sheppard
Significance, The Court Applies The Good Faith Rule, Excluded Evidence Can Still Be Used In Court
Petitioner
State of Massachusetts
Respondent
Osborne Sheppard
Petitioner's Claim
That evidence found and used against Osborne Sheppard should not be suppressed because it was gathered using a defective warrant.
Chief Lawyer for Petitioner
Barbara A. H. Smith
Chief Lawyer for Respondent
John Reinstein
Justices for the Court
Harry A. Blackmun, Warren E. Burger, Sandra Day O'Connor, Lewis F. Powell, Jr., William H. Rehnquist, John Paul Stevens, Byron R. White (writing for the Court)
Justices Dissenting
William J. Brennan, Jr., Thurgood Marshall
Place
Washington D.C.
Date of Decision
5 July 1984
Decision
Reversed the decision of the Supreme Court of Massachusetts and held that evidence is admissible, even if gathered under a defective search warrant, as long as the police acted in good faith in executing what they believed was a valid warrant.
Related Cases
- Stanford v. Texas, 379 U.S. 476 (1965).
- United States v. Johnson, 459 U.S. 1214 (1983).
- Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 (1983).
- United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897 (1984).
Further Readings
- Bessette, Joseph M., ed. American Justice, Vol. 2. Pasadena, CA: Salem Press, Inc., 1996.
- West's Encyclopedia of American Law. St. Paul, MN: West Group, 1998.
Additional topics
- McCleskey v. Kemp - Significance, Further Readings
- Maryland v. Garrison - Significance, Latitude For Honest Mistakes Made By Officers, Evidence Against The Victim Of Police Error Should Not Be Used
- Massachusetts v. Sheppard - Significance
- Massachusetts v. Sheppard - The Court Applies The Good Faith Rule
- Massachusetts v. Sheppard - Excluded Evidence Can Still Be Used In Court
- Other Free Encyclopedias
Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1981 to 1988