Other Free Encyclopedias » Law Library - American Law and Legal Information » Notable Trials and Court Cases - 1981 to 1988

Massachusetts v. Sheppard - Significance, The Court Applies The Good Faith Rule, Excluded Evidence Can Still Be Used In Court

warrant decision petitioner john

Petitioner

State of Massachusetts

Respondent

Osborne Sheppard

Petitioner's Claim

That evidence found and used against Osborne Sheppard should not be suppressed because it was gathered using a defective warrant.

Chief Lawyer for Petitioner

Barbara A. H. Smith

Chief Lawyer for Respondent

John Reinstein

Justices for the Court

Harry A. Blackmun, Warren E. Burger, Sandra Day O'Connor, Lewis F. Powell, Jr., William H. Rehnquist, John Paul Stevens, Byron R. White (writing for the Court)

Justices Dissenting

William J. Brennan, Jr., Thurgood Marshall

Place

Washington D.C.

Date of Decision

5 July 1984

Decision

Reversed the decision of the Supreme Court of Massachusetts and held that evidence is admissible, even if gathered under a defective search warrant, as long as the police acted in good faith in executing what they believed was a valid warrant.

Related Cases

  • Stanford v. Texas, 379 U.S. 476 (1965).
  • United States v. Johnson, 459 U.S. 1214 (1983).
  • Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 (1983).
  • United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897 (1984).

Further Readings

  • Bessette, Joseph M., ed. American Justice, Vol. 2. Pasadena, CA: Salem Press, Inc., 1996.
  • West's Encyclopedia of American Law. St. Paul, MN: West Group, 1998.
McCleskey v. Kemp - Significance, Further Readings [next] [back] Maryland v. Garrison - Significance, Latitude For Honest Mistakes Made By Officers, Evidence Against The Victim Of Police Error Should Not Be Used

User Comments

Your email address will be altered so spam harvesting bots can't read it easily.
Hide my email completely instead?

Cancel or