Florida v. Royer - Significance, Impact
amendment fourth petitioner john
Petitioner
State of Florida
Respondent
Mark Royer
Petitioner's Claim
Dade County detectives did not violate Royer's Fourth Amendment rights when they detained him in an airport and opened his luggage to find illegal drugs.
Chief Lawyer for Petitioner
Calvin L. Fox
Chief Lawyer for Respondent
Theodore Klein
Justices for the Court
William J. Brennan, Jr., Thurgood Marshall, Lewis F. Powell, Jr., John Paul Stevens, Byron R. White (writing for the Court)
Justices Dissenting
Harry A. Blackmun, Warren E. Burger, Sandra Day O'Connor, William H. Rehnquist
Place
Washington, D.C.
Date of Decision
23 March 1983
Decision
The detectives violated Royer's Fourth Amendment rights by exceeding the legal limits of the encounter.
Related Cases
- Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968).
- United States v. Mendenhall, 446 U.S. 544 (1980).
- Florida v. Bostick, 501 U.S. 429 (1991).
- Ohio v. Robinette, 519 U.S. 33 (1996).
Further Readings
- Choi, Jin S., and Ernest Kim. "The Constitutional Status of Photo Stops: The Implications of Terry and Its Progeny." Asian Pacific American Law Journal, fall 1994.
- Owens, John B., "Judge Baer and the Politics of the Fourth Amendment: An Alternative to Bad Man Jurisprudence." Stanford Law & Policy Review, winter 1997.
User Comments
over 3 years ago
The US is now in a police state such as Germany under Hitler. Police dogs, taser guns, illegial stops, it's just a business now to throw as many people in jail as they can and let the stupid judge decide if he wants to send an innocent person to prison. Let's bring back the swatiza and salute the almighty police.