Other Free Encyclopedias » Law Library - American Law and Legal Information » Notable Trials and Court Cases - 1973 to 1980

Delaware v. Prouse - Significance, Impact, Drunk Driving And Drug Use, Further Readings

court william decision petitioner

Petitioner

State of Delaware

Respondent

William J. Prouse III

Petitioner's Claim

Random vehicle stops by state patrolmen are justified by a compelling state interest to promote traffic safety.

Chief Lawyer for Petitioner

Charles M. Oberly III

Chief Lawyer for Respondent

David M. Lukoff

Justices for the Court

Harry A. Blackmun, William J. Brennan, Jr., Warren E. Burger, Thurgood Marshall, Lewis F. Powell, Jr., John Paul Stevens, Potter Stewart, Byron R. White (writing for the Court)

Justices Dissenting

William H. Rehnquist

Place

Washington, D.C.

Date of Decision

27 March 1979

Decision

The U.S. Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Delaware Supreme Court--that it was unconstitutional for state police to randomly stop vehicles at a check stop unless there was a justifiable reason for a motorist to be stopped. Unwarranted stops represented unreasonable seizure under the Fourth Amendment.

Related Cases

  • Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968).
  • Adams v. Williams, 407 U.S. 143 (1972).
  • United States v. Brignoni-Ponce, 422 U.S. 873 (1975).
  • United States v. Martinez-Fuerte, 428 U.S. 543 (1976).
  • Michigan Department of State Police v. Sitz, 496 U.S. 444 (1990).

Sources

Morgan, Kathleen O'Leary, et al., eds. Crime State Rankings. Lawrence, KS: Morgan Quitno, 1994.

Doe v. Bolton - Significance, Health Includes Physical, Emotional, And Psychological Well-being, The Issue Should Be Left To The People [next] [back] Davis v. Alaska - The Facts Of The Case, The Majority Decision, The Dissent, Impact, Separate Rights For Juveniles?

User Comments

Your email address will be altered so spam harvesting bots can't read it easily.
Hide my email completely instead?

Cancel or