Other Free Encyclopedias » Law Library - American Law and Legal Information » Notable Trials and Court Cases - 1918 to 1940

Carroll v. United States - Significance, Warrantless Automobile Searches Valid, What Becomes Of The Fourth And Fifth Amendments?, Impact

court appellants evidence chief

Appellants

George Carroll, John Kiro

Appellee

United States

Appellants' Claim

That since there was no basis for the search of their car, the evidence resulting from the search should have been excluded from trial, their arrest and seizure were unlawful, and the use of the liquor as evidence violated their constitutional rights.

Chief Lawyer for Appellants

Thomas E. Atkinson

Chief Lawyers for Appellee

John G. Sargent, Attorney General; James M. Beck

Justices for the Court

William Howard Taft (writing for the Court), Joseph McKenna, Willis Van Devanter, Louis D. Brandeis, Pierce Butler, Edward Terry Sanford

Justices Dissenting

James Clark McReynolds, George Sutherland

Place

Washington, D.C.

Date of Decision

2 March 1925

Decision

Upheld the warrantless search of a car, noting that probable cause existed and the mobility of the automobile made it impracticable to get a search warrant.

Related Cases

  • Boyd v. United States, 116 U.S. 616 (1886).
  • Weeks v. United States, 232 U.S. 383 (1914).
  • United States v. Chadwick, 433 U.S. 1 (1977).

Further Readings

  • FindLaw, Inc. Internet Legal Resources. http://www.findlaw.com
  • Hall, Kermit L., ed. The Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court of the United States. New York: Oxford Press, 1992.
  • Witt, Elder, ed. The Supreme Court A to Z. CQ's Encyclopedia of American Government. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly, Inc., 1993.
Carter v. Carter Coal Co. - Significance, Citing States' Rights, Court Stymies New Deal Legislation, The Bituminous Coal Conservation Act [next] [back] Cantwell v. Connecticut - Significance, Court Develops The "time, Place, And Manner" Rule, "time, Place, And Manner" Rule

User Comments

Your email address will be altered so spam harvesting bots can't read it easily.
Hide my email completely instead?

Cancel or

Vote down Vote up

almost 7 years ago

Can you be subjected to an unreasonable search and seizure being a passenger in a vehicle?

Vote down Vote up

6 months ago

what that mouth do doh?

Vote down Vote up

almost 3 years ago

Is it still considered "okay" to search a automobile even if you do not see anything illegal without cutting open the rear seat? There should have been more argument on this case for Carroll and Kiro.

Vote down Vote up

almost 5 years ago

I think there should be alil more info in this.....