Other Free Encyclopedias » Law Library - American Law and Legal Information » Notable Trials and Court Cases - 1918 to 1940

Cantwell v. Connecticut - Significance, Court Develops The "time, Place, And Manner" Rule, "time, Place, And Manner" Rule

supreme washington amendment appellant


Newton Cantwell


State of Connecticut

Appellant's Claim

That a state law requiring prior official approval before soliciting door-to-door violates the First Amendment guarantee of freedom of religion.

Chief Lawyer for Appellant

Hayden C. Covington

Chief Lawyers for Appellee

Edwin S. Pickett and Francis A. Pallotti

Justices for the Court

Hugo Lafayette Black, William O. Douglas, Felix Frankfurter, Charles Evans Hughes, James Clark McReynolds, Frank Murphy, Stanley Forman Reed, Owen Josephus Roberts (writing for the Court), Harlan Fiske Stone

Justices Dissenting



Washington, D.C.

Date of Decision

20 May 1940


While asserting that a state has the right to issue appropriate time, place, or manner restrictions on solicitation, the Court unanimously struck down the Connecticut statute as violative of the First Amendment.

Related Cases

  • Reynolds v. United States, 98 U.S. 145 (1879).
  • Davis v. Beason, 133 U.S. 333 (1890).
  • Schneider v. New Jersey, 308 U.S. 147 (1939).
  • Cox v. New Hampshire, 312 U.S. 569 (1941).
  • Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105 (1943).


Eastland, Terry. Religious Liberty in the Supreme Court. Washington, DC: Ethics and Public Policy Center, 1993.

Further Readings

  • Church and State: The Supreme Court and the First Amendment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1975.
  • McConnell, Michael W. "The Origins and Historical Understanding of Free Exercise of Religion." Harvard Law Review 103 (1990): 1410-1517.
  • Religious Liberty in the Supreme Court: The Cases that Define the Debate Over Church and State. Washington, DC: Ethics and Public Policy Center, 1993.
Carroll v. United States - Significance, Warrantless Automobile Searches Valid, What Becomes Of The Fourth And Fifth Amendments?, Impact [next] [back] Buck v. Bell: 1927 - Virginia Approaches Its Courts With A "solution", Carrie Buck As A Test Case, Supreme Court Reviews Case

User Comments

Your email address will be altered so spam harvesting bots can't read it easily.
Hide my email completely instead?

Cancel or