Zicarelli v. The New Jersey State Commission of Investigation
Significance, The Supreme Court Ruling, The Issue Of Immunity, Vagueness Of The Statute
Petitioner
Joseph Arthur Zicarelli
Respondent
The New Jersey State Commission of Investigation
Petitioner's Claim
That a state commission's requirement that Zicarelli answer questions under a grant of immunity from prosecution was inconsistent with his constitutional rights under the Fifth Amendment.
Chief Lawyer for Petitioner
Michael A. Querques
Chief Lawyer for Respondent
Andrew F. Phelan
Justices for the Court
Harry A. Blackmun, Warren E. Burger, Lewis F. Powell, Jr. (writing for the Court), Potter Stewart, Byron R. White
Justices Dissenting
William O. Douglas, Thurgood Marshall (William J. Brennan, Jr., and William H. Rehnquist did not participate)
Place
Washington, D.C.
Date of Decision
22 May 1972
Decision
The Commission could compel Zicarelli to answer questions under a grant of immunity without violating his constitutional rights.
Related Cases
- Kastigar v. United States, 406 U.S. 441 (1972)
Further Readings
- Brune, Susan E. "The Fifth Amendment and Fear of Foreign Prosecution." New York Law Journal, Vol. 219, no. 38, February 27, 1998.
- Heller, Gerald W. "Invoking the 5th in Civil Cases: Awareness of Self-Incrimination Risks in Non-Criminal Forums Can Prevent a Waiver of the Privilege." The National Law Journal, Vol. 17, no. 23, February 6, 1995.
Additional topics
- Zwickler v. Koota - Significance, An Important Reversal, An Additional Reversal, Related Cases
- Zemel v. Rusk - Significance
- Zicarelli v. The New Jersey State Commission of Investigation - Significance
- Zicarelli v. The New Jersey State Commission of Investigation - The Supreme Court Ruling
- Zicarelli v. The New Jersey State Commission of Investigation - The Issue Of Immunity
- Zicarelli v. The New Jersey State Commission of Investigation - Vagueness Of The Statute
- Other Free Encyclopedias
Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1963 to 1972