Other Free Encyclopedias » Law Library - American Law and Legal Information » Notable Trials and Court Cases - 1963 to 1972

Zicarelli v. The New Jersey State Commission of Investigation - Significance, The Supreme Court Ruling, The Issue Of Immunity, Vagueness Of The Statute

william petitioner answer constitutional

Petitioner

Joseph Arthur Zicarelli

Respondent

The New Jersey State Commission of Investigation

Petitioner's Claim

That a state commission's requirement that Zicarelli answer questions under a grant of immunity from prosecution was inconsistent with his constitutional rights under the Fifth Amendment.

Chief Lawyer for Petitioner

Michael A. Querques

Chief Lawyer for Respondent

Andrew F. Phelan

Justices for the Court

Harry A. Blackmun, Warren E. Burger, Lewis F. Powell, Jr. (writing for the Court), Potter Stewart, Byron R. White

Justices Dissenting

William O. Douglas, Thurgood Marshall (William J. Brennan, Jr., and William H. Rehnquist did not participate)

Place

Washington, D.C.

Date of Decision

22 May 1972

Decision

The Commission could compel Zicarelli to answer questions under a grant of immunity without violating his constitutional rights.

Related Cases

  • Kastigar v. United States, 406 U.S. 441 (1972)

Further Readings

  • Brune, Susan E. "The Fifth Amendment and Fear of Foreign Prosecution." New York Law Journal, Vol. 219, no. 38, February 27, 1998.
  • Heller, Gerald W. "Invoking the 5th in Civil Cases: Awareness of Self-Incrimination Risks in Non-Criminal Forums Can Prevent a Waiver of the Privilege." The National Law Journal, Vol. 17, no. 23, February 6, 1995.
Zwickler v. Koota - Significance, An Important Reversal, An Additional Reversal, Related Cases [next] [back] Zemel v. Rusk - Significance

User Comments

Your email address will be altered so spam harvesting bots can't read it easily.
Hide my email completely instead?

Cancel or