Other Free Encyclopedias » Law Library - American Law and Legal Information » Notable Trials and Court Cases - 1963 to 1972

Pointer v. Texas - Significance, Supreme Court Holds That States Must Allow Criminal Defendants To Confront And Cross-examine Witnesses Against Them

petitioner lawyer harlan decision

Petitioner

Bob Granville Pointer

Respondent

State of Texas

Petitioner's Claim

That the use of transcribed testimony in a criminal prosecution deprived the defendant of his Sixth Amendment right to confront and cross-examine witnesses against him.

Chief Lawyer for Petitioner

Orville A. Harlan

Chief Lawyer for Respondent

Gilbert J. Pena

Justices for the Court

Hugo Lafayette Black (writing for the Court), William J. Brennan, Jr., Tom C. Clark, William O. Douglas, Arthur Goldberg, John Marshall Harlan II, Potter Stewart, Earl Warren, Byron R. White

Justices Dissenting

None

Place

Washington, D.C.

Date of Decision

5 April 1965

Decision

Reversed Pointer's conviction.

Related Cases

  • Palko v. Connecticut, 302 U.S. 319 (1937).
  • Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961).
  • Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963).
  • Malloy v. Hogan, 678 U.S. 1 (1964).
Police Department of Chicago v. Mosley - Public Forum Doctrine, Legal Proceedings, Time, Place, And Manner And Equal Protection, Impact [next] [back] Orzoco v. Texas - Significance, A Significant Reversal, Impact

User Comments

Your email address will be altered so spam harvesting bots can't read it easily.
Hide my email completely instead?

Cancel or