Police Department of Chicago v. Mosley
Public Forum Doctrine, Legal Proceedings, Time, Place, And Manner And Equal Protection, Impact
Petitioners
Police Department of the City of Chicago, et al.
Respondent
Earl Mosley
Petitioners' Claim
That a Chicago city ordinance banning labor-related picketing next to a school was constitutional.
Chief Lawyer for Petitioners
Richard L. Curry
Chief Lawyer for Respondent
Harvey J. Barnett
Justices for the Court
Harry A. Blackmun, William J. Brennan, Jr., Warren E. Burger, William O. Douglas, Thurgood Marshall (writing for the Court), Lewis F. Powell, Jr., William H. Rehnquist, Potter Stewart, Byron R. White
Justices Dissenting
None
Place
Washington, D.C.
Date of Decision
26 June 1972
Decision
Denied the petitioners' claim and reversed the decision of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, affirming the decision of the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals that the Chicago ordinance banning non-labor demonstrations next to schools violated the Equal Protection Clauses of the First and Fourteenth Amendments.
Significance
The ruling extended protection of an individual's right to freedom of speech and assembly which the Court had previously affirmed by striking down state ordinances banning demonstrations in the vicinity of state capitols: Gregory v. City of Chicago (1969) and parks: Niemotko v. Maryland (1951).
Related Cases
- Edwards v. South Carolina, 372 U.S. 229 (1966).
- Gregory v. City of Chicago, 394 U.S. 111 (1969).
- City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for Vincent, 466 U.S. 289 (1984).
- Frisby v. Schultz, 487 U.S. 474 (1988).
Further Readings
- Hall, Kermit L., ed. Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court of the United States. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.
- Whitehead, John. "Academic Freedom and the Rights of Religious Faculty." Rutherford Institute. http://campus.leaderu.com/real/ri-intro/freedom.
Additional topics
- Powell v. McCormack - Significance, The Court Rulings, Moot Point, Making A Distinction, The Right To Run For Public Office
- Pointer v. Texas - Significance, Supreme Court Holds That States Must Allow Criminal Defendants To Confront And Cross-examine Witnesses Against Them
- Police Department of Chicago v. Mosley - Public Forum Doctrine
- Police Department of Chicago v. Mosley - Legal Proceedings
- Police Department of Chicago v. Mosley - Time, Place, And Manner And Equal Protection
- Police Department of Chicago v. Mosley - Impact
- Other Free Encyclopedias
Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1963 to 1972