Patton v. United States
Significance, Trial By Jury And The Constitution
Appellants
John Patton, Harold Conant, Jack Butler
Appellee
United States
Appellants' Claim
That defendants in a federal criminal trial cannot waive their right to a trial by jury composed of fewer than 12 jurors.
Chief Lawyer for Appellants
Claude Nowlin
Chief Lawyer for Appellee
Charles E. Hughes, U.S. Solicitor General
Justices for the Court
Louis D. Brandeis, Pierce Butler, Oliver Wendell Holmes, James Clark McReynolds, Harlan Fiske Stone, Edward Terry Sanford, George Sutherland (writing for the Court), Willis Van Devanter
Justices Dissenting
None (William Howard Taft did not participate)
Place
Washington, D.C.
Date of Decision
14 April 1930
Decision
The Court affirmed a defendant's right to waive a trial by jury in federal criminal cases, but required the presiding judge and government attorneys to agree to the waiver as well.
Related Cases
- In re Debs, 158 U.S. 564 (1895).
- Schick v. United States, 195 U.S. 65 (1919).
Further Readings
- Hall, Kermit L, ed. The Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court of the United States. New York: Oxford Press, 1992.
- Witt, Elder, ed. The Supreme Court and Individual Rights. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly, Inc., 1979.
Additional topics
- Pierce v. Society of Sisters - Significance, A Recent Precedent Sets The Way, Further Readings
- Patterson v. Alabama - The Scottsboro Case, Patterson's Case, Norris Case Decided, Jury Nullification
- Patton v. United States - Significance
- Patton v. United States - Trial By Jury And The Constitution
- Other Free Encyclopedias
Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1918 to 1940