Other Free Encyclopedias » Law Library - American Law and Legal Information » Notable Trials and Court Cases - 1995 to Present

Arizona v. Evans - Significance, Tempting Arrest, The Exclusionary Rule, Reagan-era Reversal, The Decision, A Growing Movement To Rescind The Exclusionary Rule

court petitioner search chief

Petitioner

State of Arizona

Respondent

Isaac Evans

Petitioner's Claim

That a computer error in law-enforcement files did not result in an unlawful search, and that contraband obtained in that search may be admitted in court.

Chief Lawyer for Petitioner

Gerald Grant

Chief Lawyer for Respondent

Carol Carrigan

Justices for the Court

Stephen Breyer, Anthony M. Kennedy, Sandra Day O'Connor, William H. Rehnquist (writing for the Court), Antonin Scalia, David H. Souter, Clarence Thomas

Justices Dissenting

Ruth Bader Ginsburg, John Paul Stevens

Place

Washington, D.C.

Date of Decision

1 March 1995

Decision

The Court ruled in favor of the state of Arizona's appeal to admit evidence obtained in a search that was underway as a result of computer error.

Related Cases

  • Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961).
  • United States v. Mackey, 387 F.Supp. 1121 (1975).
  • United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897 (1984).

Sources

http://www.gopac.org

Congressional Quarterly Digest. Washington, DC: CQ Press, 1997.

Arkansas Educational Television Commission v. Forbes - Significance, The Events, Editorial Discretion, Or Government Censorship?, The Importance Of Public And Nonpublic Forums [next] [back] American Libraries Association v. Pataki - Significance, Negative Commerce Clause Applies To Internet, Impact, Ralph Nader, Mayhem Manuals, Further Readings

User Comments

Your email address will be altered so spam harvesting bots can't read it easily.
Hide my email completely instead?

Cancel or