Other Free Encyclopedias » Law Library - American Law and Legal Information » Notable Trials and Court Cases - 1963 to 1972

Benton v. Maryland - Significance, Double Jeopardy

west petitioner court william

Petitioner

John Dalmer Benton

Respondent

State of Maryland

Petitioner's Claim

That his conviction and sentencing for burglary and larceny, accomplished in two state court trials after the initial verdict was thrown out due to jury invalidation, was in violation of his constitutional protection from double jeopardy (being tried more than once for the same offense).

Chief Lawyer for Petitioner

M. Michael Cramer

Chief Lawyer for Respondent

Francis B. Burch

Justices for the Court

Hugo Lafayette Black, William J. Brennan, Jr., Warren E. Burger, William O. Douglas, Abe Fortas, Thurgood Marshall (writing for the Court), Byron R. White

Justices Dissenting

John Marshall Harlan II, Potter Stewart

Place

Washington, D.C.

Date of Decision

23 June 1969

Decision

That the second trial did violate Benton's right to freedom from double jeopardy, and that portions of his second conviction could not stand.

Related Cases

  • Palko v. Connecticut, 302 U.S. 319 (1937).
  • Duncan v. Louisiana, 391 U.S. 145 (1968).

Sources

West's Encyclopedia of American Law. Minneapolis, MN: West, 1998.

Further Readings

  • Holmes, Burnham. The Fifth Amendment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Silver Burdett Press, 1991.
  • Israel, Jerold H. Criminal Procedure and the Constitution. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Co., 1996.
Bond v. Floyd - Significance, Can States Require That Legislators Meet Ethical Standards?, Maximum Freedom To Say Anything, Anywhere, At Any Time [next] [back] Argersinger v. Hamlin - Significance

User Comments

Your email address will be altered so spam harvesting bots can't read it easily.
Hide my email completely instead?

Cancel or

Vote down Vote up

almost 9 years ago

very helpful on provididng factual information and was easy to read

Vote down Vote up

about 5 years ago

this case dosent make sence

Vote down Vote up

about 5 years ago

this case dosent make sence