Loving v. Commonwealth of Virginia
Significance, Interracial Marriage
Appellants
Mildred Jeter Loving, Richard Perry Loving
Appellee
Commonwealth of Virginia
Appellants' Claim
That Virginia miscegenation statutes violate the equal protection and the Fourteenth Amendment's due process clauses.
Chief Lawyer for Appellants
Bernard S. Cohen
Chief Lawyer for Appellee
R. D. McIlwaine III
Justices for the Court
Hugo Lafayette Black, William J. Brennan, Jr., William O. Douglas, Abe Fortas, John Marshall Harlan II, Potter Stewart, Earl Warren (writing for the Court), Byron R. White
Justices Dissenting
None (Thurgood Marshall did not participate)
Place
Washington, D.C.
Date of Decision
12 June 1967
Decision
The previous convictions were reversed.
Related Cases
- Pace v. Alabama, 106 U.S. 583 (1883).
- Maynard v. Hill, 125 U.S. 190 (1888).
- Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390 (1923).
- Skinner v. Oklahoma, 316 U.S. 535 (1942).
Sources
Statistical Abstract of the United States 1997. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997.
Further Readings
- Johnson, John W., ed. Historic U.S. Court Cases, 1690-1990: An Encyclopedia. New York: Garland Publishing, 1992.
- Lieberman, Jethro K. The Evolving Constitution. New York: Random House, 1992.
- Seidman, Louis M., Gerald R. Stone, Cass R. Sunstein, and Mark V. Tushnet. Constitutional Law. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1986.
Additional topics
- Malloy v. Hogan - Significance, Right To Remain Silent, Transactional Immunity
- Linkletter v. Walker - Significance, Impact, Retroactivity
- Loving v. Commonwealth of Virginia - Significance
- Loving v. Commonwealth of Virginia - Interracial Marriage
- Other Free Encyclopedias
Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1963 to 1972