Bell v. U-Board of Education (32 )
Significance, Performing Arts Censorship
Plaintiff
Megara Bell et al.
Defendant
The U-32 Board of Education
Plaintiff's Claim
That the board of education had violated the First Amendment rights of the students.
Chief Lawyer for Plaintiff
Alan Rosenfield
Chief Defense Lawyer
Robert H. Opel
U.S. District Judge
Chief Judge Coffrin
Place
U.S. District Court, District of Vermont
Date of Decision
17 March 1986
Decision
The school board did not violate the First Amendment rights of the students.
Sources
West's Encyclopedia of American Law. Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN: West Publishing, 1998.
Further Readings
- Lieberman, Jethro K. The Evolving Constitution. Random House, 1992.
- Seidman, Louis M., Gerald R. Stone, Cass R. Sunstein, Mark V. Tushnet. Constitutional Law. Little, Brown and Company, 1986.
Additional topics
- Berkemer v. McCarty - Miranda Warnings, The Questioning Of Mccarty, Were Mccarty's Rights Violated?
- Beaulah Mae Donald v. United Klans of America Inc. et al: 1987 - Klansmen Plot Racial Revenge Murder, Civil Suit Goes After Klan, Klan's Violent History Traced
- Bell v. U-Board of Education (32 ) - Significance
- Bell v. U-Board of Education (32 ) - Performing Arts Censorship
- Other Free Encyclopedias
Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1981 to 1988