Snepp v. United States
Significance, Snepp Writes Decent Interval, Impact, Further Readings
Appellant
Frank W. Snepp III
Appellee
U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)
Appellant's Claim
That CIA requirements for agency prepublication review of writings about the agency by employees and former employees constituted unconstitutional prior restraint on freedom of speech in violation of the First Amendment.
Chief Lawyers for Appellant
Alan M. Dershowitz, Bruce J. Ennis, Joel M. Gora, Mark H. Lynch, Jack D. Novik, John H. F. Shattuck, John Cary Sims, Geoffrey J. Vitt
Chief Lawyers for Appellee
David J. Anderson, Barbara Allen Babcock, William B. Cummings, Brook Hedge, Thomas S. Martin, Elizabeth Gere Whitaker, Glenn V. Whitaker, George P. Williams
Justices for the Court
Harry A. Blackmun, Warren E. Burger, Lewis F. Powell, Jr., William H. Rehnquist, Potter Stewart, Byron R. White (unsigned)
Justices Dissenting
William J. Brennan, Jr., Thurgood Marshall, John Paul Stevens
Place
Washington, D.C.
Date of Decision
19 February 1980
Decision
Upheld lower court decisions that a compelling government interest justifies publication safeguards in CIA employee contracts and waives their First Amendment rights to free speech.
Related Cases
- Near v. Minnesota, 283 U.S. 697 (1931).
- New York Times Company v. United States, 403 U.S. 713 (1971).
- United States v. The Progressive, 467 F.Supp. 990 (W.D. Wis. 1979).
- Haig v. Agee, 453 U.S. 280 (1981).
Additional topics
- The "Son of Sam" Trial: 1978 - Insanity Issue Arises, Cases Consolidated, Case Inspires New Law, Suggestions For Further Reading
- Smith v. Daily Mail Publishing Co. - Significance, Juvenile Protection And State Regulation Of The Press, Impact, Further Readings
- Snepp v. United States - Further Readings
- Snepp v. United States - Significance
- Snepp v. United States - Snepp Writes Decent Interval
- Snepp v. United States - Impact
- Other Free Encyclopedias
Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1973 to 1980