Other Free Encyclopedias » Law Library - American Law and Legal Information » Notable Trials and Court Cases - 1995 to Present

Timmons v. Twin Cities Area New Party - Significance, Arguing Fusion, Impact

court respondent petitioner aclu

Petitioner

Michele L. Timmons, Acting Director, Ramsey County Department of Property Records and Revenue

Respondent

Twin Cities Area New Party

Petitioner's Claim

A candidate running for office could not participate in elections as a nominee representing more then one political party. Minnesota's statute imposing prohibition of "fusion appearance" on a ballot, therefore, did not jeopardize associational rights.

Chief Lawyer for Petitioner

Richard S. Slowes

Chief Lawyer for Respondent

Laurence H. Tribe

Justices for the Court

Stephen Breyer, Anthony M. Kennedy, Sandra Day O'Connor, William H. Rehnquist (writing for the Court), Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas

Justices Dissenting

Ruth Bader Ginsburg, John Paul Stevens, David H. Souter

Place

Washington D.C.

Date of Decision

28 April 1997

Decision

Respondent's (New Party's) constitutional rights under First and Fourteenth Amendment were not violated by provisions of Minnesota's statute prohibiting "fusion" candidates. Statutory restrictions were held permissible.

Related Cases

  • Storer v. Brown, 415 U.S. 724 (1974).
  • Anderson v. Celebrezze, 460 U.S. 780 (1983).
  • Munro v. Socialist Workers Party, 479 U.S. 189 (1986).
  • Tashijan v. Republican Party of Conn., 479 U.S. 208 (1986).
  • Eu v. San Francisco County Democratic Central Comm., 489 U.S. 214 (1989).
  • Norman v. Reed, 502 U.S. 279 (1992).
  • Burdick v. Takushi, 504 U.S. 428 (1992).

Further Readings

  • American Civil Liberties Union ACLU in the Courts: ACLU Summary of the 1996 Supreme Court Term Major Civil Liberties http://www.aclu.org
  • Hansen, Richard L. "Entrenching the Duopoly." Supreme Court Review, Annual 1997, pp. 331.
U.S. Term Limits v. Thornton - Significance, Arkansas Rejects Career Politicians, The Qualifications Clause And Other Prohibitions, Dissent: An Ironic Ruling [next] [back] Thomas E. Blanton Trial (Alabama Church Bombing): 2001 - Fbi Quickly Identifies Suspects, But Does Not Pursue Prosecution, A Short Trial And A Quick Verdict

User Comments

Your email address will be altered so spam harvesting bots can't read it easily.
Hide my email completely instead?

Cancel or